IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption for draft-haas-flowspec-capability-bits - 3/30 to 4/13

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 08 April 2021 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FFB3A0FDD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 03:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgqbDbiZmFG1 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 03:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283C83A0FDC for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 03:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 868E61E44B; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 06:42:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 06:42:59 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210408104259.GH7355@pfrc.org>
References: <000001d72569$3eace130$bc06a390$@ndzh.com> <CAOj+MMG0ONP5P4DxeaC4AEF8b_Ff43r5boQ6wL9EHHGAfVaK2w@mail.gmail.com> <20210407132506.GA7355@pfrc.org> <CAOj+MMFaJGk7-hif7Qm7Hp1=iThn5gyvmpp+UYY_q6PJEAVAPw@mail.gmail.com> <20210407223222.GD7355@pfrc.org> <CAOj+MMEmpMA9YOSU304mQed6o5gm1eUKbYNwyt88M5_E-7=woA@mail.gmail.com> <20210408004720.GF7355@pfrc.org> <CAOj+MMGukAL-fNpWh1yu=AHqnONPq9mCqqFGjK5pspFkHfn0UA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMGukAL-fNpWh1yu=AHqnONPq9mCqqFGjK5pspFkHfn0UA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/bFKBUVB3dgHH7oEw-F2CM1_Wtjg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption for draft-haas-flowspec-capability-bits - 3/30 to 4/13
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:20:38 -0000

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 09:36:01AM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Looks like we have converged.
> 
> Would it be possible to include your below sentence explicitly/verbatim in
> the draft:
> 
> "It is also an option for an implementation that understands a new component
> that doesn't want to implement it in forwarding to advertise support for
> that component and propagate it even if it doesn't locally use it. "
> 
> With that I am happy as that was my point. And of course anyone is free to
> do what they like (both implementation and operation wise). The draft/rfc
> will only provide options.

I'm happy to add some text to this effect.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email