[Idr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-lp-idr-bgp-algorithm-00.txt
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sun, 02 November 2025 13:01 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEA5808B290 for <idr@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Nov 2025 05:01:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXucIB8NC5MD for <idr@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Nov 2025 05:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F17808B16B for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Nov 2025 05:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-640aaa89697so954400a12.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Nov 2025 05:01:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; t=1762088513; x=1762693313; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LYYp2UTWNZtTQaRzov61mMtn8jMUe6iyMrYI2p55rl4=; b=D2YP8WBzUPosluF/O9w1uo7y/Eh78KX8rgv27g27Tr7aqsv9mvX7qyUhAo+FJfNFfA 0RCVvfCJ8eDzxVoObifvNWoN2t/OE7XfhLIkl97IJJah7+0fjA2jMMZR4XH/eY5mFbkT loCg2OoX83p9W5Pl4SfoiuBTIOFQUDqZtTQRxUEFeUa6TBv/0rjn/hQxsMWmzqjXTaaF 6FUrJONtWTyXMeHfC/doGbbjNHJ/DLUEKAmrlH58p/3sixfc2S0rMoMzOLQpDOKOvGEr Q6R4fINngzro+3QciMuotg2vzepjeZp2NVaCCIoB6K+l/OXFeZcOGV11EZ2reLXYA2d8 zirg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762088513; x=1762693313; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LYYp2UTWNZtTQaRzov61mMtn8jMUe6iyMrYI2p55rl4=; b=gAbhTJZRvlQggDmL3hMmyBHoOJPBLsUfi4/JgUiD4lLKY2N4E8onRS9l7Rg+m8f0KO sYmlAisLFim6L4qSEoWWcmYXPnX/2cGW5IMb2fnA7gj04LnGAVF+/XJPGCCmK4iqJA6q KMJT2BLBGaXVrKPMS4+bL4zZeobECwTVNnf+rucO9/hWDIhp870uFo3drbHcsAq+KChP 4gxX5K3icZNUi+wrLtAjdXWQnZ8A2QI1GYbmhsHo0aabaseban2peNjGRmU7Z2fXcTvX 0ItO92WhIvpnH/SSJiYsebAE6B+MKmtsHDmHAbaRk92wf1ypf1eKSGTpIoZH749Ocg82 onMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyjgfyO1HJ5g0Cm2quQdEVKFOMPZgqtew/nM4oTh3+/3UKs/C7d lt+4xSqgJCYqTLWaQMqRNvAlSbIFzLT8k1DHTYiX7Xl4ALkz2weG6Hw6izSaZDnPdkNLiriSfG/ t0Y8VXyj/WCHrnV+9IbdcFFfYitoXA8csPmLvszHlQ5ClP63fClUJ
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsgOGuBw8Dmb+Fi8/AjlX4QTe1IXyk/QURqoedQ+etAVNyE5uRl9X1odQ/uTBf ZnkiV/hvD/fNoc1czkXlqBIpmtNcAeE+s4zATOOTxuxsUpnN6I2GbLzb78mJ6K/VOKxO7Azd8+B oRVNOgSEFHyWJX809NACyNZaorX9CnVFOosjECH8AcmPebpxxspdO9ZJzQidhlCGzB+VuQ9vqdw 06auFO83sW3KkZjyUCtqhnESN9DaIb9T776trbbdzvq8q/MxGee1Deol5JKyiTpj/7rrw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGUrXQFan1H43z/E8He5z3NrfiYICjRlLCHralv0M6bESyndouwzICWVv7q0s3d1V9ZWWBcC+Ulf03HyhRXn3c=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:210e:b0:640:b06f:87ca with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-640b06fa98cmr2177306a12.6.1762088512977; Sun, 02 Nov 2025 05:01:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <176208327789.584.12251043684986317503@dt-datatracker-5df8666cb-7l4w5>
In-Reply-To: <176208327789.584.12251043684986317503@dt-datatracker-5df8666cb-7l4w5>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:01:41 +0100
X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bmy-ZpV52fm4SlSpCF31M8-POop3hb80Luo_Oymddy861kOBFDguLBXjm0
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGVPzrohgRmO_VGgqcA5moRnG2k+PzL3E5py115DD_-NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e1099606429c339c"
Message-ID-Hash: S4366P6GF3XQG4S6DCFP6QITG4XAY2AM
X-Message-ID-Hash: S4366P6GF3XQG4S6DCFP6QITG4XAY2AM
X-MailFrom: robert@raszuk.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-lp-idr-bgp-algorithm-00.txt
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/bKYpvhHFzVmjA-8iIXlNNOtcGRU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>
Dear authors,
I have two basic observations in respect to your proposal:
#1 - The notion of loopbacks of node 8 are lost at EBGP boundaries for
service/overlay routes hence propagating any information describing which
flexible algorithm given loopback is or should be part of between domains
is of very little value.
#2 - We have had months if not years of debate in the form of CAR/CT
proposals to solve the issue you are bringing up via abstracting the notion
of preferred forwarding to colors/classes. So perhaps you could elaborate
on that a bit in your document - at least comparing those three approaches.
Kind regards,
Robert
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, Nov 2, 2025 at 12:34 PM
Subject: I-D Action: draft-lp-idr-bgp-algorithm-00.txt
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Internet-Draft draft-lp-idr-bgp-algorithm-00.txt is now available.
Title: Advertisement of Algorithm in BGP
Authors: Liu Yao
Peng Shaofu
Name: draft-lp-idr-bgp-algorithm-00.txt
Pages: 6
Dates: 2025-11-02
Abstract:
This document proposes extensions to BGP to support algorithm-based
end-to-end path establishment.
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lp-idr-bgp-algorithm/
There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lp-idr-bgp-algorithm-00
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list -- i-d-announce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to i-d-announce-leave@ietf.org
- [Idr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-lp-idr-bgp-algorithm… Robert Raszuk