IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] new ID on expansion of private use ASN range

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Tue, 03 July 2012 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3422111E8178 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yud6RB0ThxG4 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDC611E8174 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so11784613obb.31 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=C2dc4HPL3CMVmbmaUhuBRMVUPJtmD5RZ+hwy0PYFU0M=; b=QNhccwcHA7O1Fi3lWpyvzlT/z9Wo4rDMjiBRgeefJ7YbXJWCaQ4fWEWWE5ZvzCKdeR vv2RN6Wg3pfXPjKIPlUXDPh5NaSv1RuoblbQIre+o3F12MzGyxleCAPnBoN08viPjZ7M iDt/1vFeEqm1w/RLf/JQSQNf5U5BFRkY+EvbDb1LONLDosRRu6H8N07jnVAOEMawXwNd vatt9WcF8i/A32GB8AQCUP07zYx2v0r3ET6MazKHeFoy0NQk/4pB13/Ikq0PDrE7B+8c rI0xvuN65AMgZdziNBz90c3vAGCsOR/l2Ornb6HL6P9hieMRCVqXI8AWraZx2JauC2y3 EYvA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.77.170 with SMTP id t10mr14243858obw.70.1341341670103; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.191.98 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120703141629.GC22598@puck.nether.net>
References: <20120702164834.GB13713@puck.nether.net> <m2zk7hxli9.wl%randy@psg.com> <20120703141629.GC22598@puck.nether.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:54:29 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -EcqnT-q7_OGr7MBoehjti_ot10
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaa0Q6Zwrce8cxYY_VtDOsnjdQF6gG+bEC3T4LZbJYuZ7w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] new ID on expansion of private use ASN range
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:54:22 -0000

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> that I can walk in and request 10K+ ASNs with minimal justification and
> low cost.  I don't see much value in increasing the administrative

I would bet that if you were a large enterprise WAN like, say: "the
Limited" (clothing store) that has +1.5 endsites, you could say to
ARIN (for instance): "Hi, I have 1.5k endsites, all connected over a
third-party WAN, we use BGP and have unique routing policies for each
site, can I have 1.5k TODAY and since I plan to expand 500 sites this
year 1k tomorrow" you would probably get that allocated, if you can
deal with 4-byte.

it's worth asking the hostmaster people I suppose.

-chris

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status