Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 01 November 2016 14:38 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392FF129705 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5uIIQutwMGgo for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492961297BC for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 07:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 551621E337; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:40:36 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: "John G.Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <20161101144036.GB10519@pfrc.org>
References: <169A4C1A-302E-4FE0-841A-ADA63E812E1F@juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <169A4C1A-302E-4FE0-841A-ADA63E812E1F@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/bk7qcWLo24iOZNwummnHCWszM00>
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 14:38:08 -0000
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 05:18:57PM -0400, John G.Scudder wrote: > The author has asked for the WG to adopt draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129. > > If you support or oppose adoption please reply indicating so. Reasons for your position are helpful, as volunteering to review, comment, and/or shepherd. As an aside, I will note that I don't think the WG has the option of doing nothing, so if you oppose adoption please address what you think should be done instead. I have a few points to raise here: 1. Do we actually need a draft published to request IANA to block out allocation of these code points? If so, we're going to end up with a number of trivial drafts for these corrective actions. I'm interested in hearing the IESG's opinion on this point. If we do need a draft, this draft is as fine as any. Hopefully we don't need one. 2. Much as it's tempting to try to use this process to try to be the clue hammer and "punish" people for grabbing code points, you burn enough bridges you eventually run out of wood. We have a few issues code shipping with such use suggest: 2a. Some of these things are features in use. If so, they're just going to have to get a different official code point. IMO, the right answer here is to push the implementors to get their registrations in order and officially request them. The penalty on *them* is the potential that someone else has already collided with them due to different squatting. 2b. Some of these things are early implementations that are against drafts that aren't fully mature. This means there will be versioning issues. Either the code point gets re-used and deals with the versioning problem or the code point needs deprecation. And even then, the fact that there's an early implementation means that eventually a code point is needed. --- It seems to me what is needed is some work to classify such early deployments as 2a or 2b. 2a just involves getting some administrative issues cleared. 2b means we should discuss how do we "clean" a code point sooner than later. Final observation: Some of this is messy due to scope propagation issues of internal features. This is another wake-up to deal with that propblem. -- Jeff
- [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijd… John G.Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Julian Seifert
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Hankins, Greg (Nokia - US)
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Peter Hessler
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… David Freedman
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Peter Hessler
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Robert Raszuk
- [Idr] Early allocations and other ways to avoid s… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… heasley
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] Early allocations and other ways to avo… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Early allocations and other ways to avo… Keyur Patel
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… marco
- Re: [Idr] Early allocations and other ways to avo… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Jared Mauch
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Jared Mauch
- Re: [Idr] Early allocations and other ways to avo… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… t.petch
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Jared Mauch
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… t.petch
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… t.petch
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Dickinson, Ian
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… heasley
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… t.petch
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… t.petch
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-s… John G. Scudder