Re: [Idr] 答复: [I2nsf] 答复: [IPsec] using BGP signaling to achieve IPsec Tunnel configuration (draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec): potential conflict with the I2NSF's Controller facilitated IPsec configuration

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 02 May 2019 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3160F12036B; Thu, 2 May 2019 05:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cfChNITfFyW6; Thu, 2 May 2019 05:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FA4A120041; Thu, 2 May 2019 05:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.176.248.72;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Alvaro Retana'" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: <bess@ietf.org>, <i2rs-chairs@ietf.org>, <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, <idr@ietf.org>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B33E27F@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAB=gXc6aZ2D1K_q3MjVJMEYxEykJO_oxhoSkOEyytOOaa=_ouA@mail.gmail.com> <PR1PR07MB5755052B214EA1243DF2A7EE95550@PR1PR07MB5755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12CA424B2@dggemm511-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CA+b+ERn16Z65zx1zhh1n2dYPVodUbqB55WCp=2FtFQcCtrF-vQ@mail.gmail.com> <C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12CA4385B@dggemm511-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAMMESsz-guoovA=23VVGpmGoK4jydS47jowC2XEgzRotx91JAg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsz-guoovA=23VVGpmGoK4jydS47jowC2XEgzRotx91JAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 08:17:20 -0400
Message-ID: <005701d500e0$fe5f9950$fb1ecbf0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0058_01D500BF.77504340"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLwizzIPZNvq12rx7rT1Vjxn5nk+QLOzUgrAvNkDmwA9dp29wF9SFXqAy2twH4B2uw7i6O2u7JA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190502-0, 05/02/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/bx_P26LO4W1rocXmh8E1qufqSR4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiBbSTJuc2ZdIOetlOWkjTogW0lQc2VjXSB1c2lu?= =?utf-8?q?g_BGP_signaling_to_achieve_IPsec_Tunnel_configuration_=28draft-?= =?utf-8?q?hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec=29=3A_potential_conflict_with_the_I2NSF=27s?= =?utf-8?q?_Controller_facilitated_IPsec_configuration?=
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 12:17:27 -0000

Alvaro: 

 

Can we set a date to discuss the IP sec tunnels?   Do you want to talk as routing chairs before we include the IPSEC and I2NSF chairs? 

 

Sue Hares

 

From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 10:20 AM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org WG; idr-chairs@ietf.org; bess-chairs@ietf.org; idr wg; i2nsf@ietf.org; <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [I2nsf] 答复: [IPsec] using BGP signaling to achieve IPsec Tunnel configuration (draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec): potential conflict with the I2NSF's Controller facilitated IPsec configuration

 

On April 2, 2019 at 5:21:09 AM, Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept) (frank.xialiang@huawei.com) wrote:

 

[Trimmed individual addresses and consolidated (sec-ads, i2nsf-chairs) to avoid a bounce  + bess-chairs + rtg-ads.]

 

Hi!

 

Thank you all for the discussion.  I’m replying to this message to pick on what Frank said…but in reality is a general reply to the thread.  

the key point is...the function gaps each draft can fill in.

Because there are several drafts that may overlap in function and content, I have asked John/Sue (idr-chairs) to work with Stephane/Matthew (bess-chairs) in figuring out the overlaps and helping the authors (if needed) to rationalize what should go forward and what is not needed because it may be a duplicate…at least starting from the RTG area point of view.

Once the consolidation is done, we should have a clearer picture on the type of interaction we need to have with i2nsf/ipsecme.

Since we’re all just getting back from Prague, please give the Chairs a little bit of time.

Thanks!

Alvaro.