Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96951A006F for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:27:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ylKeOCLwxhcK for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:27:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA46A1A00E6 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:27:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16722; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1423848470; x=1425058070; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=PRJinSwQH01zLPU+6HQ93gdjo4S9g9GENGHuHgMhkx8=; b=FcplPhttMfgepjbXB5p6IvNi6gb8NJhJnPiG5jfACMqNyClqb07Sv57O ihupLi8FNS1uG5hOah3Wbcfz6M1cmV+gDZ649uTgBcDbK3/VF5nkfbxIj MsAU/FzyEigu5BhGUoSO9G3aOabydB+GkG6d7gUrIzA5HGmQyw1RmrU15 U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CPBgBdM95U/4UNJK1bgkNDUloEsn2NQoFthW8CgRRDAQEBAQEBfIQMAQEBBC1MEAIBCA4DAwEBASgHMhQJCAEBBAENBQkRiBMN1TgBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXiwyEXA0EBgGEKgWPNINWhV+BGDiCT4sogz4igjKBPG8BgQMkHH8BAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,571,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217";a="395788299" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2015 17:27:50 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1DHRn2s001479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:27:49 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.5.197]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:27:49 -0600 From: "Shitanshu Shah (svshah)" To: Susan Hares , "'idr wg'" Thread-Topic: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015) Thread-Index: AdA0Bc0QLug1SFDRSjq/JCByM24SQwAyQjSAABLIwQAEgHCqgAAroXYA//+uuoA= Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:27:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <050701d03405$cd9836d0$68c8a470$@ndzh.com> <024c01d034e7$aee7a210$0cb6e630$@ndzh.com> <0afb01d04797$f7384c00$e5a8e400$@ndzh.com> In-Reply-To: <0afb01d04797$f7384c00$e5a8e400$@ndzh.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116 x-originating-ip: [10.24.216.32] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D10371CECE54svshahciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015) X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:27:54 -0000 --_000_D10371CECE54svshahciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sue, Its an open bgp implementation from Exa Networks overlooked by Thomas Mangi= n. Couple of ExaBGP references: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/thomas_mangin/content-exabgp-new-tool-interac= t-bgp https://github.com/Exa-Networks/exabgp Regards, Shitanshu From: Susan Hares > Date: Friday, February 13, 2015 at 6:18 AM To: svshah >, 'idr wg' > Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" > Subject: RE: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/20= 15 rto 2/5/2015) Shitanshu: Can you give a reference for the ExaBGP implementation or an explanation on= list? I=92m not familiar with that implementation. Sue From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shitanshu Shah (svshah= ) Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 8:29 PM To: Susan Hares; 'idr wg' Cc: 'John G. Scudder' Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/20= 15 rto 2/5/2015) Implementation and inter-operability results are documented at, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-svshah-idr-sla-exchange-impl-02.t= xt The inter-operability is tested between 2 Cisco OS implementations as well = with ExaBGP implementation. Regards, Shitanshu From: Susan Hares > Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 11:31 AM To: svshah >, 'idr wg' > Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" > Subject: RE: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/20= 15 rto 2/5/2015) Shitanshu: This is great news about the 2 interoperability implementations. Please sen= d the results over your inter-operability tests to the idr list. Sue From: Shitanshu Shah (svshah) [mailto:svshah@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:34 PM To: Susan Hares; idr wg Cc: 'John G. Scudder' Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/20= 15 rto 2/5/2015) There does not exist any IPR for this draft AFAIK. With respect to 2 implementations, we are currently in the process of valid= ating inter-operability of 2 implementations. Regards, Shitanshu From: Susan Hares > Date: Monday, January 19, 2015 at 8:34 AM To: idr wg > Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" > Subject: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 r= to 2/5/2015) This is to begin a 2 week Wg LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange. Please c= omment on the usefulness of the draft in deployments and on the technical p= ros/cons of the draft. In your comments please include: =93support=94 or = =93no support=94 indicate. Authors should indicate if any IPR exists for t= his draft, and the number of implementations that exist. If this draft does not have 2 implementations, it will go to a state of WG = LC completed, awaiting 2 implementations. The draft can be found at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange/ Sue Hares --_000_D10371CECE54svshahciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <942EBD3ED9D51E4B95EFA037FFCCBA28@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Sue,

Its an open bgp implementation from Exa Networks overlooked by Thomas = Mangin.

Couple of ExaBGP references:

Regards,
Shitanshu

From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Friday, February 13, 2015 at = 6:18 AM
To: svshah <svshah@cisco.com>, 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" &= lt;jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: RE: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for= draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)

Shitanshu: =

 

Can you give a referen= ce for the ExaBGP implementation or an explanation on list?  I=92m not= familiar with that implementation.

 

Sue =

 

From: Idr [mailt= o:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shitanshu Shah (svshah)
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 8:29 PM
To: Susan Hares; 'idr wg'
Cc: 'John G. Scudder'
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (= 2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)

 

&n= bsp;

Impleme= ntation and inter-operability results are documented at,<= /p>

&n= bsp;

The int= er-operability is tested between 2 Cisco OS implementations as well with Ex= aBGP implementation.

&n= bsp;

Regards= ,

Shitans= hu

&n= bsp;

From: Susan Hares <= shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 11:31 AM
To: svshah <svshah@cisco.com<= /a>>, 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org><= br> Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" <= jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: RE: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (= 2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)

&n= bsp;

Shitanshu:

 

This is great news abo= ut the 2 interoperability implementations. Please send the results over you= r inter-operability tests to the idr list.

 

Sue

 

From: Shitanshu Shah (svshah= ) [mailto:svshah@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:34 PM
To: Susan Hares; idr wg
Cc: 'John G. Scudder'
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (= 2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)

 =

 <= /span>

There d= oes not exist any IPR for this draft AFAIK.

 <= /span>

With re= spect to 2 implementations, we are currently in the process of validating i= nter-operability of 2 implementations.

 <= /span>

Regards= ,

Shitans= hu

 <= /span>

From: Susan Hares <= shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Monday, January 19, 2015 at 8:34 AM
To: idr wg <idr@ietf.org><= br> Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" <= jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19= /2015 rto 2/5/2015)

 <= /span>

 =

This is to begin a 2 wee= k Wg LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange.   Please comment on the = usefulness of the draft in deployments and on the technical pros/cons of th= e draft.  In your comments please include:  =93support=94 or =93no support=94 indicate.  Authors should indicate if any IPR exi= sts for this draft, and the number of implementations that exist.

 =

If this draft does not h= ave 2 implementations, it will go to a state of WG LC completed, awaiting 2= implementations.

 =

The draft can be found a= t:

 =

http://datatracker.ietf.or= g/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange/

 =

Sue Hares

--_000_D10371CECE54svshahciscocom_--