Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-09

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 March 2021 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C2F3A0922; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G58NPL_hM5VS; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4053A0925; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id bf3so7500520edb.6; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eqlk+BWX+zXmA7acCjMFL+y7UJkL51voxhRsNY2R5IA=; b=bj8R0/kqtKSRTzjoFfFwOrRGx0a4G3MJbPt6PbuVj2Ypk4InfbJWH3zAOgEnf1dNyV LZ3oDBEl8REYUeYaQLagtbwoINSE460/NNgSG+LmPDS11dgGiL8cn3Hx436NW2HXXiL6 c7HMgoyEtSCJ3lQv4e0TNZMmfq1uWfqVMn4/chFE9s+i9JZcOmbd19+m1WIXE9Ki1p79 eyh42oF0RBW2d/u7X6XoY6dnZMxI9FieDw8Aez6U3u8q6jP87tXmDaRf2OgAxHv2GPH8 XQ1DYaRib3rLxXYh/TlcTwAK1pI/c7xcHt+UqSvg52UH9C5/p79ymUo1TE2RODGdEUf8 vjzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eqlk+BWX+zXmA7acCjMFL+y7UJkL51voxhRsNY2R5IA=; b=fnLayniMEegYbl6VBesxmZUuKO4JBxQdLqWlrJID9hv9EqX6l4cLNSJf+ct27k6/3w e/6xYYa8L+1qE8w9HT/Krs5z6TIJME0iQBh6PpYKogQKBaiknpMhOzOhtvC4FKT+lVHQ paICf8O3U0kCldK0Eb5ejPdOg2e4m1IAysLqXQkqh5KEzq5ET896wrMaYxquBNlqj32N 5MuOgKGspUPMKgfpvrQN2IShu7CZneuaaHM5vIYBBO30e7luiFpeqfhPK6kFQb7snCv8 Yi/f/rH6Lcc2SgPf0PIxICIcEn4LeggcwEkRtEG6w03gGbBQ9YCpeo/4/CbANeb5Le9c 1ROA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HYG/L1/ZmHCYsZ2Bb3KFRVI3yWyofq55YFQj6QFIaD0gRzkwC Ykn1N4jYWoBvKYnXdQdyg25QzozKZ6lpaboMuGM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCFe14KgYKa152AceGN06sdrrAFiNoUGpQyl1JgPj+tQ+XaUuJzNNAn5n/pCfllYxgyyo1u5Rfg1uBI0mahEc=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c857:: with SMTP id g23mr17006655edt.86.1616785851234; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:10:50 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8F9D4D90-E055-40B7-BA0E-D99B39A6AEA4@juniper.net>
References: <CAMMESsw3eVnfiJ8RQ4GSSzp4b1T2n6hm-nSZ6xuyK9XCMb1pAg@mail.gmail.com> <862CFB7E-DB91-49DE-87B7-B68F94BBA406@juniper.net> <CAMMESszRZKtnW-qW6kSjn5njgQayZdtNSbL=YJr8VAKVu2XX4A@mail.gmail.com> <B1828318-180F-4FD6-902A-E0B12035B835@juniper.net> <CAMMESszvZxr9rSX2GDCGeqfQmq0ZT=at=TVOnNmpHECsW_Worg@mail.gmail.com> <8F9D4D90-E055-40B7-BA0E-D99B39A6AEA4@juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:10:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESswRBqHAhpyy6A2OYqvjOOg39CTNsQ0ZbEfYGesrd4TJEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000573ca405be754a80"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ceGIQCi0a_Q1ZnmDkPrNgN9ZZlo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-09
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:10:59 -0000

John:

Hi!

I just started the IETF LC.


Thanks!

Alvaro.

On March 23, 2021 at 8:56:04 PM, John Scudder (jgs@juniper.net) wrote:

Done, in -11.

(I’m so glad I found out the trick to decoding your secret messages. ;-)

—John

On Mar 23, 2021, at 5:06 PM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:


[External Email. Be cautious of content]


Ah, yes.

This proposal works for me.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On March 22, 2021 at 5:46:48 PM, John Scudder (jgs@juniper.net) wrote:

How about “(However, an implementation MUST accept an OPEN message that
uses the encoding of this specification even if the length of Optional
Parameters is 255 or less.)”

This gets rid of “be prepared” as well, which it sounds like you didn’t
like.