IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Mon, 03 October 2016 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51448129418 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFsK1mjZbl06 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BBB12941D for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1177; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1475514742; x=1476724342; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=V+Fwu2D66Qi64Pvvo8MLH20xXvtIifm1GnEy6mt1hfw=; b=JonPdVLuXMor+lQ29pNcDqq87rAPIZZ4CMYzHYEEXLx4ox6kFmq97iL9 8RQyX6EDr0Hgc62/o0qvqJNimOocF0TjteDXp8egucllpTJwPOvLS+hCG o/LJQM803yzvDWJ4SnaXEMpinKp2mI2T92+t/Ur5SbNAp6EK1ZAqJLUuq k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DeAwC/kPJX/5hdJa1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgz0BAQEBAR6BU6QxlCOCBoYeAoFlORMBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RhAQEBAwE6PwULAgEIGB4QMiUCBA4FFIgxCLp4AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIY4gX0IglCERIMvgi8BBJQghVgBj3CBboRmiR6MboN9AR8BNIUMcodVAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,438,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="159350915"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2016 17:12:21 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (xch-aln-011.cisco.com [173.36.7.21]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u93HCLse031406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:12:21 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:12:20 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:12:20 -0500
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSG79TGAvzbRTYaUOLNdatGR0q+6CTny8AgALbUg+AAFuDAP//w9BUgABdGYCAAD/ogP//s3BtgABU8wD//7aMOwAKnNYA//+wcOU=
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 17:12:20 +0000
Message-ID: <9C759C3F-0571-45C7-ADB2-618A6A0D78D1@cisco.com>
References: <147531113077.4216.12599976309263776317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161001085434.GW20697@Vurt.local> <005b01d21d58$aaf869e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161003095936.GC20697@Vurt.local> <04cf01d21d68$52c656a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161003115723.GD20697@Vurt.local> <57F27D3F.7090404@foobar.org> <74D0D4D0-0885-4E11-BDAB-85F9356B4AA1@cisco.com> <20161003161608.GG3127@Vurt.local> <D5115E3C-371A-4397-B8EB-090CE6B5A4F1@cisco.com>, <20161003165706.GM20697@Vurt.local>
In-Reply-To: <20161003165706.GM20697@Vurt.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/cfbEOjcEYy7xHUf1yghIgjfEAcY>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 17:12:25 -0000

An implementation may give you a match condition for reserved range. I haven't (yet). Private AS has 2 ranges. The match for that is still on my todo list. If it were one range, then it would be done.

One range please.

Thanks,
Jakob.

> On Oct 3, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:53:14PM +0000, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
>> I write code. I watch people write code and test code. It adds to
>> development time. 3 ranges is not necessary. It's messy.
> 
> As an implementor, you are not supposed to do anything with these
> ranges0. They are just reserved in the sense that they belong to IANA,
> not to a single operator. For the moment, operators should avoid using
> values from these ranges, but implementations shouldn't prohibit them
> from doing so.
> 
> This is no different than RFC1997 which reserves the following two:
> 
>    0x00000000 - 0x0000FFFF
>    0xFFFF0000 - 0xFFFFFFFF
> 
> Can you elaborate on whether IOS XR treats RFC1997 values from those
> ranges in a special way? (aside from the well known communities
> ofcourse)
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email