Re: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)

Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info> Tue, 10 October 2006 04:10 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GX8wg-0004iL-4d; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:10:22 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GX8we-0004hs-L3; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:10:20 -0400
Received: from monster.hopcount.ca ([199.212.90.4]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GX8wd-0001mA-Dg; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:10:20 -0400
Received: from [67.99.248.2] (helo=[10.111.113.102]) by monster.hopcount.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jabley@ca.afilias.info>) id 1GX8wP-0008vW-TP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:10:06 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20061009201106.GD46025@verdi>
References: <E1GX06V-0006wb-4J@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <20061009201106.GD46025@verdi>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <5ED54533-DC71-46AD-B9EC-DE9FDCC19E54@ca.afilias.info>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:09:59 -0500
To: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: idr@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

On 9-Oct-2006, at 15:11, John Leslie wrote:

>    And there's a particularly obvious alternative: simply  
> continuing the
> decimal notation used now. We've already adapted to five-digit decimal
> numbers without a whimper: is there really any reason to believe six
> digits will prove unworkable?

But then how do you distinguish between a 2-byte only AS number and a  
4-byte AS number which happens to be less than 0.65535?


Joe


_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr