Re: [Idr] [IANA #1183451] Protocol Action: 'Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules for IPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21.txt)

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Mon, 14 December 2020 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FCF3A0ED2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 01:58:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tix.at
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RG5tsD7YwCfw for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 01:58:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.fbsd.host (mail.fbsd.host [IPv6:2001:858:58::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3BB53A0EA5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 01:58:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tix.at; s=rev1; h=References:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type :Message-Id:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Kf9Y8ZH0Q7+sB/iiTD+d9FI0TV9oGsRAmI/LVvfcF0I=; b=oxIpRkLqK/d9PlojcSGLYg1cJl Bo0y8QsINwOCC0PCfYkellILZObmog8nuC0AsP98VkyCZmgokYS424SiU8mfE31GmFL0KLMyxvMc2 2ThwB+ZCyF3V2eBQpJnbjGxQnYSNDiPZ/IIyyRIqGSDKOyLjXUa3nsxtxRMNbIZDH7wG69QnbvLF/ EVZRtU6hD2H1/w2qSm9k5x+51AsLR9plK3DT3f6h/QmBdlhtoBIKWeInrBr5Ou5DGEccuDO7Y5fOx AzWGuo5j3kA/mM9V3bCIbmFH9QWUDGt59L72Rm2T/vEDNssc80ypovwh041FK+xXw7tjyOnq2orUY c+n6gdNA==;
Received: from 80-110-96-202.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at ([80.110.96.202] helo=[192.168.64.148]) by mail.fbsd.host with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1kokc1-000A9g-8h; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:57:49 +0100
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
Message-Id: <7DFC5595-BE3D-4439-89DE-D5CD67B27267@tix.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BB8901CD-2C0D-4A02-8B9B-452FBB9AB541"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:57:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-28479-1607629303-186.1183451-37-0@icann.org>
Cc: Christoph Loibl <cl@tix.at>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
To: drafts-approval@iana.org
References: <RT-Ticket-1183451@icann.org> <160633728675.12753.7196765652787201447@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-23170-1606958379-573.1183451-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-28479-1607629303-186.1183451-37-0@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-Scanned-By: primary on mail.fbsd.host (78.142.178.22); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:57:49 +0100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/cnmh3bbXWn5BQ6Sk38Lzdtm5NlU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 04:52:38 -0800
Subject: Re: [Idr] [IANA #1183451] Protocol Action: 'Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules for IPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21.txt)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:58:37 -0000

Hi Amanda,

CC also to IDR for reference.

Sorry for the delayed answers to your questions. During the review of the changes I noticed that the Action 2 requested a new codepoint from the Generic Extended Community registry but the document is clearly referencing a IPv6-Specific-Extended Community in sections 6., 6.1 (the IANA section 8.2 was not aligned with the text above). 

I updated and uploaded  a version -22 of the document to correct that defect. Alvaro reviewed the changes. I will also notify RFC-Editors about the changed document.

To answer your questions:

ACTION 1:

>> QUESTION: All words in the registry other than "flags" and "length"
>> (at values 9 and 10) were capitalized by this document. We have no
>> opinion, but should those words have been capitalized as well?

  
Please capitalize those as well. The -22 document also addresses this nit.

ACTION 2:

Please revert the -21 changes and see the new -22 Section 8.2 for the correct registry that needs to be updated.

Sorry for that.

Cheers Christoph

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 10.12.2020, at 20:41, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Authors,
> 
> This is a reminder that we need a reply to the message below.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
> On Thu Dec 03 01:19:39 2020, amanda.baber wrote:
>> Dear Authors:
>> 
>> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED
>> 
>> We've completed the registry actions for the following RFC-to-be:
>> 
>> draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21
>> 
>> ACTION 1:
>> 
>> An "IPv6 Name" column, references to this document, and a new
>> registration at value 13 have been added to the Flow Spec Component
>> Types registry, which now reads as follows:
>> 
>> Flow Spec Component Types
>> Expert(s): Susan Hares, Robert Raszuk
>> Reference: [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 
>> Range   Registration Procedures
>> 0       Reserved
>> 1-127   Specification Required
>> 128-254 Expert Review
>> 255     Reserved
>> 
>> Type Value      IPv4 Name       IPv6 Name       Reference
>> 0       Reserved        Reserved        [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-
>> 26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 1       Destination Prefix      Destination IPv6 Prefix [RFC-ietf-idr-
>> rfc5575bis-26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 2       Source Prefix   Source IPv6 Prefix      [RFC-ietf-idr-
>> rfc5575bis-26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 3       IP Protocol     Upper-Layer Protocol    [RFC-ietf-idr-
>> rfc5575bis-26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 4       Port    Port    [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-26][RFC-ietf-idr-
>> flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 5       Destination Port        Destination Port        [RFC-ietf-idr-
>> rfc5575bis-26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 6       Source Port     Source Port     [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-
>> 26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 7       ICMP Type       ICMPv6 Type     [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-
>> 26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 8       ICMP Code       ICMPv6 Code     [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-
>> 26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 9       TCP flags       TCP flags       [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-
>> 26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 10      Packet length   Packet length   [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-
>> 26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 11      DSCP    DSCP    [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-26][RFC-ietf-idr-
>> flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 12      Fragment        Fragment        [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-
>> 26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 13      Unassigned      Flow Label      [RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>>     14-254  Unassigned      Unassigned
>> 255     Reserved        Reserved        [RFC-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-
>> 26][RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> 
>> QUESTION: All words in the registry other than "flags" and "length"
>> (at values 9 and 10) were capitalized by this document. We have no
>> opinion, but should those words have been capitalized as well?
>> 
>> Please see
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/flow-spec
>> 
>> ACTION 2:
>> 
>> We've added the following entry to the Generic Transitive Experimental
>> Use Extended Community Sub-Types registry:
>> 
>> Sub-Type Value: 0x0e
>> Name: Flow spec rt-redirect-ipv6 format
>> Reference: [RFC-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-21]
>> Date: 2020-12-02
>> 
>> Please see
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-extended-communities
>> 
>> Please let us know whether this document's registry actions have been
>> completed correctly. Once we receive your confirmation, we'll notify
>> the RFC Editor that the actions are complete. If a team of authors is
>> responsible for the document, and the actions have been performed
>> correctly, please send a single confirmation message.
>> 
>> We'll update any references to this document in the registries when
>> the RFC Editor notifies us that they've assigned an RFC number.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Amanda Baber
>> Lead IANA Services Specialist
>