Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt (9/2 to 9/17/2019)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sun, 08 September 2019 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C19B1200CC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 14:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ptzM-N8b-jdS for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D26120013 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id i78so11109286qke.11 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kAhKxsK+wbAzMCFmhTnbwNB/+JYhl2OWgsTqT3Qu/8s=; b=bQCBjc8/3BEhGi6Dcr1mrhv+lCBlcDxQ1IOTUUKlgC7jdbpIT38YgrmBOCTHrlTYDJ pb5bJnC0ys39imyG1YqzRTfEAkq+YueRe9HV1foH8qmgVW07Vw0Q+nhOwcUsLlDdXERP QfohvkpJClpkvaKHFDgRva2viO2wLU5w6Bm8WWjwCJBMHdMKNCC1z4hsgF6cOIEapmyJ fngrJyvYcPW2CwWg+UQDEfWnrwOH9zVBgZwup6IUCKmBJVS5qekWBGKjujQ1cifdiHP4 k/jymBDR6fWPLrhIjaHmeSLCxy2+QNOxQNwkPA6LUx7Yia3EcW8GBRZXyjhdEuPbAdhE RRQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kAhKxsK+wbAzMCFmhTnbwNB/+JYhl2OWgsTqT3Qu/8s=; b=b4pnSZs7Q2M+J/crw3+VSIuULxCi9clGagSZ4KacKFvKlKVB+JnPCECeA0g3xFZXGO 1p4DJl0Y9yd2OaipU0vzG0T7UWgXoC6alfmRaYHrj/8V1C9GZv6Zj50rUgLp1TeNsfjD uYkRY0KLVB1PEVuujiMQGXlo6hmeV85HGhOGRbebxqWICTN/DgTVzmvj93G3auxnFiHu zWPhkJrQlMYMfa0av31tOHcgeo+vVmR57bFMAeUTsH9FDkQFw4+5LpvKEWrJmZDRN+9x bNEsYU4BY08s6AOBn1TxlJ8WJQFmAF5YgK7seYuwXeFgnYaglLiRzBfhYan+cZEgOuqk migQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUrI5prrSk1XJNlK5BnlMNneZrPOUz4WVQysXqgmK/Vg6W7L95/ B+KQntb8vtKbnWChp1nOZIrla/5ZEjx+0HDGrlv5Kg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxabtfD+LBlJKNTij/8yJOtSedgYv3N3+AVi8DQRPMS7HzATxMBATMR9Ak90ySkl7FGcUqDx5qukqXepfaf888=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:8547:: with SMTP id h68mr19546784qkd.219.1567978579492; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 14:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <003701d561b8$84171680$8c454380$@ndzh.com> <970E5C9A-7251-458B-8F9F-B452BDF58AE6@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <970E5C9A-7251-458B-8F9F-B452BDF58AE6@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 23:36:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHEGwZ8YuaVvG0-mdKYb1gWbb6+8rM3Onf3X=CQGsbZQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003f143f059211763e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/cs33EKusFBg98gVbao33XN1i6DI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt (9/2 to 9/17/2019)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 21:36:23 -0000

Hi Acee,

I have read the draft. Have one key question in fact triggered by
colleagues comment below :)

In the draft you are not making any distinction between iBGP and eBGP
sessions. Is this intentional ?

Procedures to establish and maintain eBGP vs iBGP sessions are
vastly different hence an obvious question if you intentionally made no
distinction or perhaps you had in mind all along that the draft applies
only to eBGP ?

I think for eBGP it is useful, for iBGP I already see real cases where it
may not give you what you expect.

In any case I support the adoption.

Thx,
Robert.


On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:57 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

> Speaking as a co-author, I support WG adoption.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
> *From: *Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <
> shares@ndzh.com>
> *Date: *Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:02 PM
> *To: *IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[Idr] WG adoption call for
> draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt (9/2 to 9/17/2019)
>
>
>
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
> draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt which you can access at:
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode/
>
>
>
> For those who have indicated support for this draft during the lengthy IPR
> call, you are welcome to comment again
>
> or to trust that the IDR chairs read your comments during the lengthy IPR
> call.
>
>
>
> Please indicate if you think this draft is a good start for using the BFD
> technology
>
> as a check that prevents BGP connectivity until BFD session is established
>
> (indicating link connectivity).
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Susan Hares
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>