Re: [Idr] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-22: (with DISCUSS)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 22 April 2020 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D4E3A0CD1; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=qeCAUCoe; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=VGfbTPk+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O3FQ1rGkv-gE; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4B213A0CCA; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E13C5C01FA; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:03:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:03:03 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=p voN+9jfU4F8EaJy3HED9inYW7VrC/E2aEtWiU7SklU=; b=qeCAUCoeqryN7+2BZ wL+lq7qV6Bl2BSPNNMbsPYxshwyj8sPc4qhhdKzj7EeBYn8rKVstJFZjUfndAQOu L6lNUq/oZ617agI62FDp+kkCBnK/wodgRSQP3f/hep9RyFI1/hq52pSMIXG7gtlE qLl5zZzejEkBrA2eCWJ2CB5F/LKRWknFg59sbqFfLna8OGC+hHMl011jN0wxvU4E ywm392k/DTvYrrx3PnGMcaF+bwghtwNtFhVOrNO3ClMg4GMJ5is7awkYAul2upli b2bTBWbbgibYDuundojelnPMTSEdprsGpcC3GYGNTPo8J08z6ZrpJ7hikOJACb7m OlbBQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=pvoN+9jfU4F8EaJy3HED9inYW7VrC/E2aEtWiU7Sk lU=; b=VGfbTPk+fAvt1kzPMvPTDeI7y1U/7AHLMDDxmVgYoNV1J3Wg2welas7n4 wcDZHcheFu9axPDmeJvRMSGTGsZJk4kgdOyHC7WwXNV5y5hd/isaL0YG3rBE25DI BiGmTapvp8EIGSNXfIjHbc/9yolZNP/8fPaZ3kkw42rLfZ9ddxRc9wGGWBYIPwiH DAycltNv7VI0a5QhiI2Qy8KYU0I7Zkiu/E4RzL9u2Qqo+d7uExe2ZtTlPDgW/cmN S+v9fI5yQa7HIbZ0wpPj7/k1kF0GJ2Xuo02VbXVsaP8321e7e5Vxyj01Y+vt2RnW 8eYLclMMKZrDNHSD5YYINYPR6A2uA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:lk6gXk4quD8cn_z1dJl6Egg_uL1duTzltP33Vj4VKoOMRK6Kdiskjw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrgeejgdeijecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecukfhppeduje efrdefkedruddujedrjeeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehm rghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:lk6gXtxF1ww9e-3sm3N9-GOWr_eQRqKnezA0vmJwLP6rh9HgMvMZGg> <xmx:lk6gXmvNCL-DpwVkTflbTjIsLXQE9Sv8zIW-4kjFudUIb7xDi99cRA> <xmx:lk6gXt_uniBJMtVpbkEAqbgb2J4IzlnqJvYIcyesmOI-jeAUaCDQOQ> <xmx:lk6gXhOZpG87cxK5j7FpGt446PXChih_7x1SY1U79qrvsoTa0O6eWw>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D594C3280060; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:03:01 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESswTW_C_wB2g4ADVwDk872PuZqGK=ycnq1QKs4zyu3xTKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:02:57 -0400
Cc: idr-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org, Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>, idr@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2316B33C-8C79-4A23-B126-5B4D6EB11FBC@cooperw.in>
References: <158756317450.27447.7394258570701485593@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESswTW_C_wB2g4ADVwDk872PuZqGK=ycnq1QKs4zyu3xTKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/docIPD5yrVIOW0RdObhYZzHCy20>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-22: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:03:05 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

> On Apr 22, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On April 22, 2020 at 9:46:15 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> 
> 
> Alissa:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Apologies as this may be a really silly question, but isn't it possible for
>> traffic-rate-bytes and traffic-rate-packets to interfere with each other?
>> That is, if by mistake a flow specification shows up containing both actions
>> and they contradict each other (e.g., 0 bytes but 1M packets), how is that
>> situation supposed to be handled?
> 
> See §7.7.  It is left to the implementation to decide which filtering
> action to use.

Right, but 7.1 and 7.2 say that traffic-rate-bytes and traffic-rate-packets don’t interfere with each other (or any other filtering actions specified), so presumably 7.7 does not apply? 

Alissa

> 
> 
> Alvaro.