Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 08 April 2020 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2483E3A1736 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 13:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G-PoKMKzlkkD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 13:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 053563A1731 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 13:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id a32so330927pje.5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 13:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version; bh=L0/FZCilVGNsCYOLSCy/pvUbXMXhHzltaCX95+B45kc=; b=Go7RHK3f2maXuA0Lu46OjvIJObKQFQXV6MnkTHuZJ/wea1tb8kpF5SNC6dvkDitDV9 dalKWa2m+tM4FFxTezdP8NgS7zIbtVtbGvjBJ09XGHH/zdTPs6OJpLPdSRqf3+QyHSgl T7vledM8l+Rf40WA0T7L714gWSiPo17cKhIDSKI43s92mvPLpk9830Dr80PZaIDEoitR 0gtUtuEgq6Qi5xAaOaVfRGXwSewIYFb18rfJo2sDXYmU4cigce5MuEk0+RsY/qxqZLTr 3pudZtmrI+GyqdlxRLbqbZ0AzFAlh9mLFGgHgN1zr7YfpLZMdk/GO6TNFbzmJzdF12+O bT5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version; bh=L0/FZCilVGNsCYOLSCy/pvUbXMXhHzltaCX95+B45kc=; b=K7NobVz44p6iI+NnrH1k8WJ2QTAdfG8SYz0av/gme9Zk20lap3Qd0bkB2Db2emoNlm 0tpZJq6BSQpXd55K8za/qGr4TVVzXsScQSBeAfVGAn0ivCWIZW2JLNi2ZcG+d0gmfgRG 34qwaV18UQprL6W3Q3Wamu0NvKSTNfXmOVnuhpfPa834f8HQEk0ER1ZKmKQMmm/emes3 TIQV+SyJnk3yeFDur+Cs1/0n0Fdhs2hvihP0KZuTU26wAwc8uNK7QRYqTYPf0BAhVN+g IyA1p1upHI2RGznNGTcdbU2l/sQB6r1NKR6HjDS2WpyWGoMUCiVwJG5j5jUMcVcEU0tJ Knmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY5R5HjOOIqRZN3Qzuq7xUyILFmMK82H5CWfpWGWNXbCRd2PYP0 tGB3CNd3XjtrbtIrfMCImoXNl2LS
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypInoXeyGfPCDjZMwgv64c+UVACms/hjz2Gu/xPcX3D7bOva4KEt2Dhuk7+WV46RFrM+Xo8S/w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:8e:: with SMTP id bb14mr7703082pjb.13.1586379207446; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 13:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8sm17456383pfv.65.2020.04.08.13.53.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Apr 2020 13:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 13:53:20 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, idr@ietf.org, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Message-ID: <c6537b8b-b021-4e0c-b014-a47a54db29f7@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <00c501d60dbf$26a17b40$73e471c0$@ndzh.com>
References: <008901d60da2$74031370$5c093a50$@ndzh.com> <DDB167A3-977A-4815-AE9B-C5D404816CAE@cisco.com> <00c501d60dbf$26a17b40$73e471c0$@ndzh.com>
X-Readdle-Message-ID: c6537b8b-b021-4e0c-b014-a47a54db29f7@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5e8e39c5_7aa0799a_16f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/e4KYA77KKApFHufgrhqLyev2T_Y>
Subject: Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 20:53:33 -0000

Sue,

Alvaro has submitted  draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-16 to IESG a few days ago.

Cheers,
Jeff
On Apr 8, 2020, 9:03 AM -0700, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>om>, wrote:
> Acee:
>
> My understanding is that the authors need to address the issues that Alvaro raised.     See email on the subject on 2/21/2019.
>
> Keyur said he would get on it on 2/21.  Life may be challenged.    The other option is to Ping Gunter or Sri.   I’ll ping them again today.
>
> Maybe it will raise the urgency and they can deal with it while we are offline
>
> Sue
>
> From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 9:00 AM
> To: Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -
>
> Hi Sue,
> One clarification…
>
> From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 8:40 AM
> To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -
>
> IDR WG:
>
> A little status to read with your coffee this morning.   We have an interim at 13:00 UTC (9:00 EDT,  6:00 PDT, 21:00 Bejing time)
>
> Please let me know if I’ve missed any updates.
>
> Cheers, Sue
>
> ---------
> At IESG in IETF LC
> 1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-19.txt –
>     Shepherd: John Scudder
>     Status:  IETF LC ended, IESG telechat: 4/15
>     IESG Publication request: 7/9/2019
>    2  AD Reviews [8/2-9/10/2019, [1/17-1/23/2020]
>
> 2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-08.txt
>      [Shepherd: Susan Hares]
>      Status:  3rd round of AD revisions
>      IESG Publication requested:  10/15/2019
>      IETF WG LC:  6 days
>
> --------------
> AD review – authors need to respond
> 1) draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-14 - sent to IESG
> [Waiting 47 days]
>
> So, this draft requires a response from the authors to Alvaro? It hasn’t gone to full IESG yet – right? We have a couple LSR drafts with a normative reference.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> 2) draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-05.txt
> [Waiting 57 days]
> ------------
> WG past WG LC – stuck  waiting for implementation reports on wiki
> [reported to have 2 implementations, but no details on wiki]
>
> 1) draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param
> 2) draft-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt
> ---------
> Drafts stuck post WG LC – waiting for minor edits
> 1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis.05.txt  -
> ----
> Flow specification drafts in WG LC
>
> 1) Draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10.txt
>    Status: restarted [4/8 to 4/22]
>    Status: IESG desires, but is it ready?
>    Needed:  implementation reports
>
> 2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-11
>     Status:  3/13/ to 4/13
>     Status: light response, please comment
>     Authors:  Please fill out implementation report
>
> -----------
> WG Adoption calls:
>
>    1) Draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec
>        WG adoption:  3/30-4/13
>         Shepherd: Susan Hares
>         Comment: only 1 response, heading toward “no consensus”
>
> 2) draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec-transport-mode
>      WG Adoption: 3/30 – 4/13
>       Shepherd: Susan Hares
>      Comment: only 1 response, heading toward “no consensus”
>
> 3) draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt
>     WG adoption: 3/30 – 4/13
>      Shepherd: Susan Hares
>     Comment: Positive response: Heading toward WG Adoption
>
> Request for input:
> ----------------------
> draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04
>
> Proposed WG LC drafts for flow-specification that were on hold:
> -------------------------------------------
> [Authors should contact chairs]
>
> 1)  draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-interfaceset-05 –
> WG notes indicated this might go ahead without flow-specification v2
>
> 2) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect-10 –
> WG discussion needs to occur on whether flowspecification
>
>
> Proposed WG LCs (3/30 and 4/8)
> ----------------
> 1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-08 – on hold pending  revision -09
> 2)  draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn-13 – in slides for 4/8
>
>
> Proposed Adoption calls
> -----------------------
> draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-udpate-00.txt
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr