Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-heitz-idr-wklc-02 (3/9 to 3/23)

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:52:05 +0000

Hi Sue,
I have reviewed both revisions of the draft and support adoption. It makes sense to define well-known large communities as has been done for communities and there is already a proposed usage.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Idr <[email-masked]> on behalf of Susan Hares <[email-masked]>
Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 5:18 AM
To: IDR List <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-heitz-idr-wklc-02 (3/9 to 3/23)

This begins a WG Adoption call for draft-heitz-idr-wklc-02.txt.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-heitz-idr-wklc/

In your review of this draft, please consider:

1) Should IDR standardize a set of “well known large communities”?
2) Will the transitivity field help these well know large communities?
3) Is this document ready for adoption?

I’ve not received Sriram’s IPR statement.  If this statement is not received within 1 week, this WG adoption call will pause waiting for that statement.

Cheers, Susan Hares