IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-02.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 15 March 2017 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FE0131690 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yv72eIHW3neZ for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C520113167B for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id x35so14945699qtc.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Ynhybf2VF1LjG+ky0R9IkwjM41OAoXhlIwHJDoECuyY=; b=OF255cE13k48zP6BtZ3NH2Lqn3RpVYuh6hxwjl9FLWiXdo1rF4klRC31vmx5Co2yzY TXE8dAjz5EO/SdAmA/blASFTMP4FaqIzeWEIDp95NPBTgAhazhESPmKW8R2+YBXZGcns XImxW+BPT9E5mbarQef+MKYPDSNhXVuenLxq3lMIM8so9Qb92NwimBp3bE0zYp9sFlMu C+E1Vx0CnGbu7UICSqL/E7Cr/v04uxB/yWbZBswA1JnV9sCkDBdhJg186DCF8ZSsuG8I Wc7fe1wcxt2DmASCwicTtiPhGTqHngEwbrFGeIMNxfwBTKq9H8yq3XBLo6Vt2jk4WFzp CTdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ynhybf2VF1LjG+ky0R9IkwjM41OAoXhlIwHJDoECuyY=; b=t/vHzSzLipMgJg9GC6EJITXg3CXkQXFR+54NMtgLc4b7mYTwC2hDdfZgQ+A3Y6lnUj yqJwdr2F+AZEcqxYnSuslmwBMcsLPc7EPFuNDqQrN6cu7K/y76zFFJFvX1G4z9z4oSRa yETB3OSwV4jbnfyjBx9Jr0zzWLq49DH3uDvwmDQYVo998TBkhm9tgd0h7jzlBWmZFiRL HVOaaaAnR1s3y7WhpsY7pyuCiXi0dZGzGzpRwPcW896+hFknJ8TSY43qyyqrtqOv9EEc Wer05xiSSbYQWQDqvxvwQiSp4m967uAmQdzCRbDiICmX8syajaPoi3IirXvGdG+5atfG AlKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1M/iejah2vMIHOSGEiHE8KV3+hAjQkaHzCSK9F5q9fiHOul8jbC/ZZmcmErCGjNEF0ydx0KGFk9zZ7Eg==
X-Received: by 10.200.0.25 with SMTP id a25mr3148809qtg.199.1489591531879; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.42.181 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <58C95A05.3030107@foobar.org>
References: <CA+b+ER=f-S118JtY--n-B0P+CB0yvy_rw3JaJpWw02n7prQ=Ww@mail.gmail.com> <20170314204212.GD12864@pfrc.org> <815723FC-B143-4410-B0FF-D9FB4F827862@cisco.com> <20170314213607.GH12864@pfrc.org> <20170314214832.s3k37p27y7xfpfsv@Vurt.local> <CA+b+ERmLDNzF=TofW=w1OwUzeLGUc-3muMckHTH6Rs=c8rc5bQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170314223333.bw3caxfn34y6zlb7@Vurt.local> <CA+b+ERmMOyqb8HFtNXyDr8e+MNxA7EWmJFukUNgSjAU+69f5CA@mail.gmail.com> <20170314225855.GN12864@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERkt6MJUPR-4WX0LYZ9CG1FoNX-g4=hnqFB9iQy8WfKOww@mail.gmail.com> <20170315000326.GO12864@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERmWUL-pVwjW8Vq+Vz8UzYDpcVBZxxhtM6WFqhmG+r35WA@mail.gmail.com> <58C95A05.3030107@foobar.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:25:30 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: DGW6ckKuDoX2vdlRq9Na6LMmlWI
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmCPDQLqk6xGRdcwhR8ecd+hgbvwt+cM9N64jMdf0g0Yw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e73621e475a054ac68e66"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/epi7EBJ5wA3h-6Tt1Elne2FRtyI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:25:34 -0000

Nick,

One thing is to try to use IGP to distribute routes. Completely another
thing is to use it as topology discovery and next hop liveness signalling.

I am talking about the latter ... not the former.


On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> Robert Raszuk wrote:
> > Has that approach been considered here
>
> I have seen people attempt IGPs at IXPs before.  It was hilarious.
>
> It wasn't intended to be hilarious.
>
> Nick
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email