[Idr] Jari Arkko's Yes on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11: (with COMMENT)

"Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 05 January 2017 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D8A129483; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 03:29:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148361577234.20637.4254770915971046067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 03:29:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/evvOdObFQvA4vNHGiBerYbvfvE4>
Cc: idr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-large-community@ietf.org, rjsparks@nostrum.com, idr-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] Jari Arkko's Yes on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:29:32 -0000

Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-large-community/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course we shall approve this document and make it an RFC!

Thanks for the work.

However, I do agree with Robert Spark's Gen-ART comments re: the first
sentence of the Security Considerations section. I'd either remove the
sentence, add pointers to other RFCs with actual security implications
content, or reformulate to ".... has similar security properties as RFC
1997 (even if those were not documented in that RFC)".