[Idr] draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10 - WG LC [4/8 to 4/22]
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 08 April 2020 12:19 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E88B3A08A3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 05:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.246
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.398, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jq0pcOXitdgX for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 05:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB02D3A08B6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 05:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.25.188;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 08:19:26 -0400
Message-ID: <007601d60d9f$f26b5590$d74200b0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0077_01D60D7E.6B5D10F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdYNnyiVr2ZUmibuT5KsNcvNg3xGuw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200407-0, 04/07/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ex72dxA4JaP7W9MGyJ_7734SQoQ>
Subject: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10 - WG LC [4/8 to 4/22]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 12:19:32 -0000
Greetings: I'm going to again restart the WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10.txt. The WG LC call is from [4/8 to 4/22], and the draft can be accessed at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6/ The IESG requested that when a revision for RFC5575 is sent in that it be accompanied by an IPv6 capability specification. In the WG chairs mind, the draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10.txt fulfills this requirement. However, this WG LC requests that you consider: 1) Is this draft ready to be published? 2) Do we know of any of implementations? Drafts in IDR can pass WG LC and await implementations. Cheers, Sue