Re: [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07

Alvaro Retana <> Thu, 30 April 2020 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B223A0953; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69qpmr6ioJYF; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595933A0942; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id g13so6291434wrb.8; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H5vq11Ck3ue0DR2YM9QSrN+S/VmVrtsMbdxAUnukLhY=; b=bf+YStx8qiY2hrDJUlBjM6VPGEkM9RCpFMJFWrN8oD/0mUUEnoU7ZLWfw3T9kFKxsY yW3Mr8UXxVIu3p+55Q9OIXcwTZa/bRCmZ1IH8oKR7O5Utu+1mgAFgayuXsetLsuP5QZ6 z5zrkSBGHsv1zM2uWMZVEod0mcwMzf+Cnex+KJSaSxP04/JVlu2zYKTH+Dzc4V1hwiRo ebmyA34eugldtFYRT1oqyzb4o1lnL1N2Bqqcc5O14uZcLK0iNf69FIEhki53lirWIct5 w3BnsEkeZC4TThEErv+Nhaupb+ynZZ4buDcu201Os/h4zeQe8Xcg3iaOLiwLKZa+xZ5Q IQlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H5vq11Ck3ue0DR2YM9QSrN+S/VmVrtsMbdxAUnukLhY=; b=Z3ltq8cVpceYHbSuOBoaiIadT8BsZHvp/gIzOTNNhe5DasJHq5ZCi4ACUr4uta2lkn y8rVT2my79Ov3Ff/FzBq3Jp48zcjejGBklFJi4/keZv8ejFwXrLs4vEK/k/E+2q5jE8k gD+Wb1jwAd+gPt5cfS9+aAH/xuqfJVZXLUpRHt5Ek3lvAnR3u6ikgNvHf9ndZvrbYYWl rvZwSZiUS7+SegOvdsxviD1hKZ8lwPTG5TUenxgDh0wW2I8R9wlXf3TBnFvLg2umuRIR Kb1KXYqtEpc8dPlRFgbe4xXXHVocqZbbwJTv1OibHZxFWI1Iw3rvwh/G8JpC8AcORUO2 tT2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYRWZxcNM0D9QDTaLHIsQhQsRlGKBZgk/Ezt2A1LDMd48QYVF22 7YKzb7bfoKioWATnoAndEUJ+HxmvVXDr7/C5DzVI9+H9
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI8zB9jeBL/9dYsyKFv67nURvFg0a1ulIbTP42KTxYJH0HKTNF3EkJRzemmlVOk9Ci+5y03DmgZlKDS5bw/eqg=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9793:: with SMTP id s19mr3022940wrb.147.1588244099503; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by with HTTPREST; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:54:58 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:54:58 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: Theresa Enghardt <>, John Scudder <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:55:07 -0000

On April 26, 2020 at 4:28:18 PM, Theresa Enghardt wrote:

Theresa:  Hi!  Thanks you for the review!

John:  Please make the changes below before the document is discussed
by the IESG.



> Regarding the code points that are now assigned as "First Come First Serve"
> in Section 3, the document points to drafts for some of them, but not for
> all. Is there any documentation for the code points that are currently
> without any reference? If so, please provide a reference. If not, maybe it's
> worth briefly stating that for some of them there is no reference and that
> they are all deprecated, e.g., because they were used in past experiments.

Yes -- for consistency they should either all include a reference
(which is available) or not.  Because of their nature, I would rather
if all just pointed to "(this document)" to avoid confusion with
continued work.

BTW, we should also be consistent in the "prestandard" tagging: add
the tag to the 185 entry.

> For code point 129, a reference to a draft is provided in the "Description"
> column, while for code point 185, a reference to a draft is provided in the
> "Reference / Change Controller" column. Is this intentional? If not, please
> consider unifying the presentation here. Otherwise, please consider making
> clear why the references are in different columns.

s/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/Routing Policy Distribution