Re: [Idr] IDR WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 (3/11 to 3/25/2021)

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 13 March 2021 07:16 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9183A0FC7; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 23:16:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id irrLPqKZQ86T; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 23:16:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F6B53A0FC4; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 23:16:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id x21so2066782pfa.3; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 23:16:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mC+76zG8LmLWwuio7u0gZZ58ZjeBTLCJZRbUH82dxKQ=; b=SiOVuJj2GUonsp5pkSrM+yjS4EdfJ1SSyXmT3p+9bNKpGNO0d7dnzpCOzlwZz3QtXT T2D5WLhPv32lA6lIyIW4TnbAbkKPaTMCBFs6Lihij9a2yAGJsiytvHPFn57fIDdQJrB9 Cl+uYG/TxNPZT/PVLHoM/nwCtAFNAFCvaY9Dga9NOjik6SmAPHqkeFo8UTtZ5iieTzsm kL++FqhxW9ctLJKgiiB1LWK5fW+jXx10rNGOxNRo2chTJ40QEdxQ1LLF2tdFtCdGVC5X JH7VhKKfV+sELJjUKm5bg4xfZksOkPkmGJbH8sPxhMBFr3aQDeJ/dT1cFM8KKvu9Swso C4jg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mC+76zG8LmLWwuio7u0gZZ58ZjeBTLCJZRbUH82dxKQ=; b=cjSWpvOQc67K6JO5c4/P61KyoLlPRjK1UDgZ6yTr5kSfnRgawiw2HKQYYBku+TNY1J CHp9oDVFXHH8IMdJlQajQm6UvynpVcjJvV0lwFtnLMMbC8vTXDALFQtfJrs9TyBteWvn Yp+Tib/hBrqMtMYyNYTZZM6qXcyA7lhDM+3r2bPVpJSbJbhwZG+ltnPKoVbni4/1CNTI 4BVPKRU9ZfTzw1+dZ6v9RF584ybSWZ93l8iQunrRPLIxl8dqff4sDy7RsKt7LllMc4Ox jFH9YlYpyX1K7QyIU/QwKV99V05HWCgDNQsqSKmWx7httj1m/sVosPAK/T9CMsk/0qt6 1k2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532s3osg3UpUwfXO4FT7g2ajeWDtktUFX18Pb2A9g2wyht+7Vs8X kkxSvffZsEojUFUWPSKhIvbDzfw/4i8Uijs4KHbm80ql5Ew=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwa0V8IP1Mc2tb6a/5LrfAkOTUjYOd+aFZKaqenLc4Jw5N+U2xQ6CwEuZ+6boQKdS47ilsjJeKMgEop1qvevX8=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:62c7:: with SMTP id m7mr14883648pgv.50.1615619773035; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 23:16:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <006e01d7166f$b257d300$17077900$@ndzh.com> <BYAPR11MB320766ED11B6E38507A704D6C0909@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB320766ED11B6E38507A704D6C0909@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 02:16:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV0E-ddLQ1EHYnmBd8mxu5gR7wJ-ap2EnQktUp0yMshvpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a9f70405bd65cab6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/fXV_WH7TH4Y86awvhGa7r1BJbXw>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 (3/11 to 3/25/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 07:16:17 -0000

Support

Thanks

Gyan

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 6:20 PM Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Makes sense. Support.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jakob.
>
>
>
> *From:* Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Susan Hares
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 11, 2021 4:12 AM
> *To:* idr@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Idr] IDR WG last call for
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 (3/11 to 3/25/2021)
>
>
>
> This begins a 2 week WG last call for
>
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 from 3/11 to 3/25.
>
>
>
> You can find the draft at:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry/
>
>
>
> This draft suggest a cleanup on several BGP Extended Community registries
> in
>
> order to replace the "Experimental Use" registration procedure in
>
> some entries, since their use is clearly not experimental and thus
>
> misleading.
>
>
>
> In your review comments, please include whether you feel this
>
> draft is ready for publication.
>
>
>
> Since Adrian’s registry draft (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry) was
>
> improved when sent to a wider audience, we the bess WG
>
> to also provide comments.  To aid in quick review,
>
> I’ve included a short portion from the Introduction
>
> of this draft.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers, Sue
>
>
>
> ===============================
>
> [RFC7153] reorganizes the IANA registries for the type values and
>
> sub-type values of the BGP Extended Communities attribute.  As a
>
> result the IANA maintained registry entitled "BGP Transitive Extended
>
> Community Types" includes a range of Type Values (0x80-0x8F) with
>
> Experimental Use registration procedure.  Out of this experimental
>
> range the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 have been assigned via [RFC5575] and
>
> [RFC7674].  The primary use for those types and sub-type registries
>
> is non experimental.
>
>
>
> Section 2 of this document requests the registry cleanup to reflect
>
> the actual use of those code-points (removing "Experimental Use" from
>
> the sub-type registry names) and changes the registration procedure
>
> of the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 to first come first serve.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD