Re: [Idr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-25: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 June 2021 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0513A1B69; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dPjXHHdni2tg; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A225F3A1B6B; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id gt18so9211585ejc.11; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iiUrfuvY+NxP6IQ9j2XuZMLMrGwo/en6bWmyt4f09I4=; b=Z6zFOXeLcsNZECB8bJbWfsqWywG8BjVHBygz2blTRlgvz6GRySc5SWMfyXTvxwg2E8 DpJ1mNLlFpWGPjb0lDptDOx449hB3uFQrRFGjPc0qoeoTE90px6WVJs9nnLGprl539WV xGMhhHzYKQT6kVy2PTxNSH1huUEDZQ7M8+JiiWzBwo41PKX1B6P7biYQ6rf8ho3bbH1t Q+r6pB0diriZC8cw4ZEJtnTPMPBWDLy9PI3XXnktmfKhaCK5+ofQBZbnekEoX6zu2iKl MoxJOMrqLAwyDbCt/uHVZxIjrhDC00MdDMBHbHYMW+enrCbmLlKC/s/0qDUjkmJw+4v1 OUcw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iiUrfuvY+NxP6IQ9j2XuZMLMrGwo/en6bWmyt4f09I4=; b=mXR8Fr3m/lDNGLdCyNQUs8HQJSzmWA3VPyAUjvq2E6YM/o7RreBz5JOGOaByIzaZGR gBgL9+j8FWj4GNSdEoYAQZZnxpJY2HNJ4O0hZcNTAKV/QkvEOFM2lnk67EuOv+UJsFbO Vd9Mz8+jmFje9OMaYkbCiRSIUxTzp8nWsn0gBOXjQbKFK+mqnb7N35m8wMhOtRC7hbXZ GH3XWyjtIVEdaVJKGpmCxX4Q1oLtJSNqVYof85J2sV4E4vafYDOwVofxu5VfSOI5+0LZ q4vjnb7EPt86Yp1jsgl064WVCbv98+QOT9yLgZ1BqBYNCaNr+lvwXhgh+f4VXzbpNP3z lk3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KFChNenzOiVZ9t9hNTiRyJ5cwyXes5nITsanQJXMOJWHcJgvv I4NtqVm8TuFkag2BURdC8IVLzs1Az2PpJa3wZLY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwL03kebn6Bbp0CtWl0tGkgWlTRSj33BSlH+SrB5iwH2Dnp7ulIlA9iMJnsO6gCXM8vWhx2dVS4Ov/pvqzRpto=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ce4a:: with SMTP id se10mr4832175ejb.235.1623928906279; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:21:45 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMG==ErnFVa-hc8kkYHvMf0e69UYDyMvkpWmqx=m7cQj_Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <162386038468.2054.10058025206181569780@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOj+MMF+kZYv6Gp9s7xGUkcKR7SQCxZdfQtWnhvaZK1nzBCPGA@mail.gmail.com> <2802f70e-a5f7-aef3-8979-c0b68dfffe69@foobar.org> <CAOj+MMG==ErnFVa-hc8kkYHvMf0e69UYDyMvkpWmqx=m7cQj_Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:21:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsx6KLiYV-0pWfSGyZoOUtvRUY+B=zzYd-mHYNGx9s86=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr-chairs <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection@ietf.org, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/fsaMZdhhBEmO_Z9ELrDjg50me2Q>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-25: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:21:52 -0000

On June 17, 2021 at 5:46:48 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:

> We are also discussing with authors if this sentence deserves a bit more
> clarity to narrow down the applicability scope. The point being as correctly
> pointed out by Bruno that network can be global and one region may deploy
> ORR and other may not and nothing will break.

FWIW, that was my interpretation when I read the draft: it is not
necessary to deploy ORR across all clusters in the network.  The
sentence could use clarification.

Thanks!

Alvaro.