Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (6256)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 August 2020 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F5B3A092D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G8Py7hR6DtvN for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE793A0901 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id f1so19129722wro.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HfOV+uyMHh93T/WcJ12YR4iUuuJVpFYH8ZGm1OUSR+s=; b=fMyEMOvyf/IPL41oNq5fYHoeXOTVB70lvsXDEZq9+q/YhBnp2ZGhN/I3Capz1dhuxx nyevH3d8wMdSDZb9X9yqZoy2MQRO2YiorEkPLtnOPVAVYz/kK3V/iKxPmZnP/9+c1tBf LqRmRUCXC71x1IIQzxuK9R1KtARs4QyhZ1pcGWZ4eHpYQtDsGpqcBVvxbcnCRxxY/B5y ZJ4g5WBgiCyXL3ghz735DED5rulf85S077oPJhhcMqd5FJ2+pWsdYCGchrM532tBx1b4 FJATk4kr/Bp4rIbcaTFc9V6ePuuBJNPA/fYwH3vHBUvobgXzC9yEpmloYned+RowTfU/ AEfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HfOV+uyMHh93T/WcJ12YR4iUuuJVpFYH8ZGm1OUSR+s=; b=KN8Jqzi0wbV1DxxMlOwziT66LV54kQ2xG3eQdVame09YqAN3ouI6KH7/ZTztYqa6V1 rFawh0aFHvGiu4JRazD+js/HE4doD3tCYGsuAaOAdMmCiwPvd7u//5ItTtKud2k8oSlE 4fDbwDy8njoRjQnpIpaudEH/Ym464bwvjlaTYx61K0Er7aJr1K/8JVSBsFRgaobKwSsY YUNj8QeU/WI/JLModFzrTVy3vNyb3bF48fFPR41s1ws63W1rxhgPRQb7LsRGBktdrvpb 7LNFRQwgnmDXvNG/Pp37MR0xgIIChU3SsrZ5bbw+FuJf1fnL2ymqoHbkukZvceSAW+BK V7Pw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KlgvYfHLazLN8EEOdS1YTMCyYnhpYrNdyVklv6YBgzwYvlRqJ GH3o2Pe3uoecahdZ/IS7OADC5lTIESAbJlCOOcM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOyD0Ob7rBaHLBYRGmWKCYcjAL27CuhRL4VzlKtCjgXPQcuKBYaYjUkVgSvpaDyfb1HQh4PdnoPbvQ86slyT8=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ea0f:: with SMTP id q15mr386367wrm.113.1597773733716; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:02:13 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAQzaWPRe-D7ZdrC2WCjbVJMFPrxcB7L8_1RQMxQ_Di4wfhM5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200812183630.4079DF40752@rfc-editor.org> <053CBA33-3347-4074-92E2-9FE9DA8FD92B@juniper.net> <CAAQzaWPRe-D7ZdrC2WCjbVJMFPrxcB7L8_1RQMxQ_Di4wfhM5Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:02:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsx=xvnXwGoHaeZvDsNsS_6qiqE5OX+iCbFNQe5TkvTm=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: anton yushkov <antonyyushkov@gmail.com>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>, "skh@nexthop.com" <skh@nexthop.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, "tony.li@tony.li" <tony.li@tony.li>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d4675c05ad2aafaa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/fssq4EB2So25ERrzMgP1assWJZc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (6256)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:02:17 -0000

Thanks Anton for filing this report!

I’ve taken care of the proper flagging.

Alvaro.

On August 18, 2020 at 1:05:41 PM, anton yushkov (antonyyushkov@gmail.com)
wrote:

Good afternoon.
How can this errata be confirmed or rejected? Do I need any further action,
or will the community of specialists make a decision and report it?

пт, 14 авг. 2020 г. в 17:38, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>et>:

> Sounds right.
>
> —John
>
> > On Aug 12, 2020, at 2:36 PM, RFC Errata System <
> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> >
> > [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> >
> >
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4271,
> > "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6256__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SpELvNfLhQUuQ203AvJuTme321r3LEellWBGShISiC4EiRgcaRihajHiLAC-cQ$
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Editorial
> > Reported by: Anton Yushkov <antonyyushkov@gmail.com>
> >
> > Section: 5.1.3
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> > 3) When sending a message to an external peer X, and the peer is
> > multiple IP hops away from the speaker (aka "multihop EBGP"):
> > ...
> > - By default, the BGP speaker SHOULD use the IP address of the interface
> that the speaker uses in the NEXT_HOP attribute to establish the BGP
> connection to peer X.
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> > 3) When sending a message to an external peer X, and the peer is
> > multiple IP hops away from the speaker (aka "multihop EBGP"):
> > ...
> > - By default, the BGP speaker SHOULD use the IP address of the interface
> that the speaker uses to establish the BGP connection to peer X in the
> NEXT_HOP attribute.
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > confusing incorrect word order:
> > reading the original text, the reader might think that the BGP speaker
> is using the NEXT_HOP attribute as part of establishing a connection with
> the peer
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC4271 (draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-26)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
> > Publication Date    : January 2006
> > Author(s)           : Y. Rekhter, Ed., T. Li, Ed., S. Hares, Ed.
> > Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
> > Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
> > Area                : Routing
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>