Re: [Idr] Adoption Call on DT document (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-autoconf-considerations-00.txt) [3/10/2021 to 3/31/2021]

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 16 March 2021 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8699A3A0C93 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WPCruYhyTYg3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89CF3A0DE2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 98E231E446; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:59:56 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210316195956.GB29692@pfrc.org>
References: <010401d715d7$b061cb70$11256250$@ndzh.com> <CAOj+MMEePjA4rCrGKP22nBYeimkDWUs0ZGDOiqjHxoFR3+3i3Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEePjA4rCrGKP22nBYeimkDWUs0ZGDOiqjHxoFR3+3i3Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/g9D1IzC6n4CcowwbjBea3SoL62U>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption Call on DT document (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-autoconf-considerations-00.txt) [3/10/2021 to 3/31/2021]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:38:49 -0000

Robert,

I will be covering the state requirements for autoconfiguration in a
separate thread.  However, I do wish to note:

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Robert Raszuk wrote:
[...]
> Number of requirements already duplicate what is exchanged between peers in
> BGP OPEN.
> 
> Is a BGP speaker capable of autodiscovery supposed now to filter peers with
> the same BGP_ID ?
> 
[...]
> Support AFI/SAFI is already covered by BGP Capability negotiation. Do we
> need to repeat those procedures here ?
> 
[...]

> We have been working in IDR for many years on
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raszuk-idr-bgp-auto-discovery-06

This draft includes the elements above you're complaining about.

> So now perhaps more valuable would be to review this work instead of
> creating a requirements document ?

Appendix A of the autoconf considerations draft contains comparisons and
critique on the various proposals sent to date.

-- Jeff