Re: [Idr] Any WG LC requested?

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Mon, 24 February 2020 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515DB3A0EB7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:11:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aw-qyx6hNCVh for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:11:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hated.at (mail.hated.at [IPv6:2001:858:2:8::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DAC3A0EB6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:11:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 80-110-104-164.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at ([80.110.104.164] helo=[192.168.66.207]) by mail.hated.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1j6HGZ-0004qQ-CL; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:11:38 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
In-Reply-To: <002e01d5eb1a$45068570$cf139050$@ndzh.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:11:34 +0100
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1A8EDE9B-0480-4407-B047-BFE4046DAB83@tix.at>
References: <002e01d5eb1a$45068570$cf139050$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/gBLlcjEkY17CEw6Ve8VfSfEOM2s>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Any WG LC requested?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:11:45 -0000

Sue,

I would like to see WG LC for:

	draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6

This is an implemented technology for years, already (I see no value in postponing this). It has been edited to nicely fit to rfc5575bis (which I hope is now close to publication as well). 

Cheers Christoph

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 24.02.2020, at 14:56, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> Here are the potential WG LC that I have gotten: 
> ·         draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-07.txt ,
> ·         Draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid
>  
> Where there others I have missed?  
>  
> The chairs wish to have  discussions on the following topics at IETF 107:   BGP flow specification, BGP auto-configuration,  BGP over IP-SEC, and the latest BGP model draft. 
>  
> If you have additional topics, please make sure you’ve posted a draft or asked for the next step in WG action (adoption, review, WG LC).
>  
> I will post a status message in 2 days after this query.  
>  
> Cheerily, Susan Hares 
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr