Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
In-Reply-To: <002e01d5eb1a$45068570$cf139050$@ndzh.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:11:34 +0100
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1A8EDE9B-0480-4407-B047-BFE4046DAB83@tix.at>
References: <002e01d5eb1a$45068570$cf139050$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/gBLlcjEkY17CEw6Ve8VfSfEOM2s>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Any WG LC requested?
Precedence: list

Sue,

I would like to see WG LC for:

	draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6

This is an implemented technology for years, already (I see no value in =
postponing this). It has been edited to nicely fit to rfc5575bis (which =
I hope is now close to publication as well).=20

Cheers Christoph

--=20
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 24.02.2020, at 14:56, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
>=20
> Here are the potential WG LC that I have gotten:=20
> =C2=B7         draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-07.txt ,
> =C2=B7         Draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid
> =20
> Where there others I have missed? =20
> =20
> The chairs wish to have  discussions on the following topics at IETF =
107:   BGP flow specification, BGP auto-configuration,  BGP over IP-SEC, =
and the latest BGP model draft.=20
> =20
> If you have additional topics, please make sure you=E2=80=99ve posted =
a draft or asked for the next step in WG action (adoption, review, WG =
LC).
> =20
> I will post a status message in 2 days after this query. =20
> =20
> Cheerily, Susan Hares=20
> =20
> =20
> =20
> =20
> =20
> =20
> =20
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr