IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 29 November 2012 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB4621F8C0F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:14:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S1foxx5HoqAW for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ia0-f172.google.com (mail-ia0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C41721F8B8F for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id j26so12169932iaf.31 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:14:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+Dl7CQ+4OFEtyJrELQKY3R26bM29ZM4A81iCoX0Hxls=; b=rUz7W7hgbcZKBA7SuuShWjjx7A9poBKHiflDuGinIkcpg81AUVyzQw3JoyB8wdkp81 D57cPaC/LWFUCCG3Ft/rYE2HTt6958c20Lge0buUbimx/TMJAP58lzytT4UXB3XuoIq+ 5uLhA8/LgRmHuOYbslfZf1wPsGtQNsPi0LDEIeTLi+NrvaqDMiCafaGQ/HmX93uWoBGl Y79wwky/cOhD0JmZtBMOe37ZDw3GasNBGx22oh2YbAmcMaV4M9mJneShj907dt7FmTi5 z7v+9+uQue+ncaCnT9nA+E89qoERhD80lR/iF1myozuMSgZiNOs2s/nUgIIXegm+Djta O61w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.170.66 with SMTP id ak2mr26921758igc.38.1354220069917; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.135.100 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:14:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <135D3112-A4CB-4B88-AD4A-5A34706566C5@apnic.net>
References: <B6B72499-E9D0-4281-84EB-6CA53694866E@juniper.net> <2CDB688B-9C24-4AF5-8900-20A88211AC54@apnic.net> <1AF020BC-65F1-4484-AAAD-355A294A7692@kumari.net> <CEEF8969-16D0-42B9-A093-F058E5D1848F@apnic.net> <574CC47E-4BF6-4749-8B44-CFA526ECDFD6@tony.li> <135D3112-A4CB-4B88-AD4A-5A34706566C5@apnic.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:14:29 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: EjVHPfQlDNZLqDvNLGFjZBHCTFU
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERm0a36YuiVMqvdMnMyLEjet-=emaowGJJQMQgx3pEzo_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:14:40 -0000

Hi Geoff,

So let me ask a very simple question in light of Brian's point ..

Is it better for someone privately to just pick random 100K of ASes
from 4 octet block and apply to his private needs or is it better if
such pool is well known ?

Who is going to stop Jon or Kevin or Sasha to do the former ? Internet-CIA ???

Cheers,
R.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status