Re: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)

Ahmed MostafaSaleh ElSawaf <aelsawaf.c@stc.com.sa> Tue, 07 April 2020 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=2366e023cc=aelsawaf.c@stc.com.sa>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B453A1A7E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 03:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQQ5PuDqIdFr for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 03:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ESGRYBM03.stc.com.sa (esgrybm03.stc.com.sa [212.118.156.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91E43A1A7C for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 03:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: d4769c58-cc9ff7000000df62-11-5e8c528d1f5b
From: Ahmed MostafaSaleh ElSawaf <aelsawaf.c@stc.com.sa>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'IDR List' <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)
Thread-Index: AdYGjhUttAt3lPHsTfmnpSciWcUkAAGM7EUQ
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:14:17 +0000
Message-ID: <f6d4e11833144e1f93418814076ee84a@stc.com.sa>
References: <01a201d6068f$c1f3aaf0$45db00d0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <01a201d6068f$c1f3aaf0$45db00d0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_f6d4e11833144e1f93418814076ee84astccomsa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA5VUa1ATVxh1NwHDY3UJCXxEselWO4jKI0ENLVC1doRRq4Lj9AmGsEBq2GA2 QaFTi68qCKhFLY2C0OID1MKAWkYYW1NpFbHQ2iJipVYBlZcgIqUt0rsJ4FJ/dX/sfHO+e893 9txzVyQQ/0jIRFrGSBsYtY6ydxSelOwvmZMZnhHp19k/Q9V+sw1X/dPZLlyAhxYWDuKhBzuu 263E30nFgqLVxqQIbRzjGxKkZhi9UW2k5TE0qwmmIla/Ll9og7R6hqXk2phgKoCSJ+rUGjqB ZozBlDoxkWZiqBBH+XNPEFqmZeQ0o9HHaJm4YCosYsUclWpu4Bx/KmR1PC3XMrF6Q8Lacqf4 BxebBYlt722s6jwsSMU2r0rHHERABkBl3m0hV9uTKmhIr5rI1RIyCBp27RBwtSu5Hjry8gQ2 3AD1A9cwW62A3std1lpIToe8oRJUi0QEGQhFfy3mYDE5D4b2D9lztQM5H0pK+6zLMdINBmpO 4lwtIN2hqeUwbpNDQmFVncBWS+HB3ad2tjVrof6TzdaaIF3g8uctQtsaD7hwvFG4B3Mx86jM vC1m3hYbPhvyKx/Z2+pZcLSgQzBa1357F+fj+djEYkzyRsSS8LcXLfdT+rBGjY9Gn+DDqssw dPi/JB16qwIr7u/2sWCkCKOcCfO9tEixnTqJTU6wYDswEU7JiKX+4ZFi12h9THK8mo2PYk3R CVqWRUdNSYn2sIxI8aSxnsGko1lKQsSuRDAxBkebdOsQ0blVGXwiht7A6mgjyiI1jQjbgAa7 84awiVqNVm9io0wGnQUDkQDRyjLRIiJGnZxCG/S2YRZMg85ur0Am1ehRrBljlL9SEahQKJQK f/9A5f+DKXfihgppJONQutfRdCJtGJ1yAOWC8iSwCRMmiN0MdBy9MVarQ9L5dgARzn23C79t c8SdaD+3C/HyO1ZTPIlub9QYx8jz5UVi4W/ok2XjB463Bhc5cP44yiQsumO0QW0yIsfRbY1i 0XW1YFswkTPlYVMuZhPVCQjmq5YQTku50xpt2RS7Et0rEOo8ilrVehBS7gPHWHhKPYmGZKTU 7dkAvsoa7BgmulCd94VA1FtciN4D3FssZPQMLZtKrDmLtkq5rfEmZrypMnciiptJ8rpWhTI3 4kleeqR4Mq/BiUR0tefTx9M90ymTEwPcLo9xw/hS27EjOLoKQOQHr0Nnif6V//HLlXDkBDmP dGx2oVRy4XYaAa1uAXGVw0YpeGZNJRo5s6Rj5HwBiiMY+r0ccoSc+1/ikHOmH4e8rLN2sLOt dSLcb65zgJLhnU5QO5TrBBfNpc5QWNFCQM7vlZOh7KfPSBjMzHWBxs7vpPC04pIM+h4+kkHN tqopkNpT7wn9bVenQVrLthfgQfGvcijbm0FBVUEWhagGXoKf+7dPh8HNW70gu/WAF/xR2T4T Om81eYO56/4syEnL9oO0fd1+cKJjp7KdSxb+LFno9/9cshqid3HJGmmNJku1KY1L1gg6kqy5 HDjGMi5Z8zZZkzU2gO+WLBX3niTMbVX+CSl32HeXLKq7U9f4zcdbB1+LPXvNdfYHfa+U3/Nc /JDa0nved41Pg8jBXLFMtzh0KHc5XqosgtPON0+E+B6rGqz3Mi+In7kmOEX7IXWlrLQ3PSmg a+GhrJrHdZKmTW63l/VdedQ8vF6UpSQ/LYCLkeHJPySkH/zEMuPG9VtTZtdWe3dF4bu/PtZ7 fEN4tamsNc436nFzwe2aorCVCpVlR1tmz6ma7O6GJLvT0fvl3/slN0F+eZbfXumpxx1/D+wu PrpC9ZFX4PDw0uUvs5d6Vi/Z516bvSfkRJVDa7Vwxtb5bkrBV5Kjr163PHE98/6breV9RWu3 hw7YB+BT7XqUx1MoIRuv9vcWGFj1vxq0dCfhBwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/gSbK2dfdOerINz0EF6qg0ojTL4Y>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 07:01:08 -0000

Dears

I believe it is valid use case , I add my voice to support the adoption

The adoption of SR is increase within SP and PMTU is an important and Major topics that should be handled in right way

For below question


1) Is there a need for this mechanism in networks using
        MPLS-SR or SR-V6 and SR policy?

The problem statement is clear , and the answer Yes. It is vital requirement to have a right encapsulation for SRv6 without take in the consideration the underneath environment.


2) Are there any error handling issues besides what is being
     Taken care of in RFC7752bis-03.txt


3) Do you think this draft is ready to be adopted?
     In this category, please list any concerns you have
     regarding adoption.  This category can include
     general concerns about BGP-LS, MPLS-SR,
    SR-V6, and SR-Policy.



No Concern







Thanks




BR
Ahmed El Sawaf

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 3:36 PM
To: 'IDR List' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt

You can view this draft at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu/

This draft distributes path maximum transmission unit for the
SR policy via BGP.

Any discussion regarding on whether one desires
SR Policy should be clearly distinguished from the
Technical discussions on the mechanisms to pass SR policy MTU.

The questions for the people to discuss on this draft are:

1) Is there a need for this mechanism in networks using
        MPLS-SR or SR-V6 and SR policy?


2) Are there any error handling issues besides what is being
     Taken care of in RFC7752bis-03.txt

3) Do you think this draft is ready to be adopted?
     In this category, please list any concerns you have
     regarding adoption.  This category can include
     general concerns about BGP-LS, MPLS-SR,
    SR-V6, and SR-Policy.

Cheers, Sue Hares






The information in this email may contain confidential material and it is intended solely for the addresses. Access to this  email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the email and destroy any copies of it, any disclosure, copying, distribution is prohibited and may be considered unlawful. Contents of this email and any attachments may be altered, Statement and opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender, and do not necessarily  reflect those of Saudi Telecommunications Company (STC).