Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954883A0E82 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 01:38:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x7yHE9YJuVYY for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 01:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469B13A0E7C for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 01:38:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.7]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app12-12012 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eec602e3574e65-9e687; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:37:57 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eec602e3574e65-9e687
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.2.50.166]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee4602e35741dc-a4e1c; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:37:57 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee4602e35741dc-a4e1c
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
References: <010e01d6fb0b$c5c08970$51419c50$@ndzh.com> <000c01d6ff4b$d5d03330$81709990$@tsinghua.org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <000c01d6ff4b$d5d03330$81709990$@tsinghua.org.cn>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:37:55 +0800
Message-ID: <010101d705d9$bd03e470$370bad50$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0102_01D7061C.CB272470"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQG1smfZprFU7mP/HezyWekZ+lQr16qTMjLwgA0cBEA=
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/gTqXOyakzDrweHJTQ-VADDUQWLQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:38:15 -0000

Support the adoption.

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

 

 

From: idr-bounces@ietf.org <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 11:38 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021
to 2/18/2021)

 

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (from
2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021) 

 

This draft defines a new Outbound Route Filter (ORF) type, called the

Route Distinguisher ORF (RD-ORF).  RD-ORF is applicable when the

routers do not exchange VPN routing information directly (e.g.

routers in single-domain connect via Route Reflector, or routers in

Option B/Option AB/Option C cross-domain scenario).

 

Please be aware that this draft has one IPR statement attached. 

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4579/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4579/..

 

Please consider the following questions in your review and comments: 

 

1) Will this new ORF filter reduce routing information at key points? 

2) Should the WG consider this draft given it has an IPR claim or 

    Would the IDR WG prefer another approach? 

3) Is this draft ready to be adopted and refined as WG draft? 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares