Re: [Idr] Adoption Call on DT document (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-autoconf-considerations-00.txt) [3/10/2021 to 3/31/2021]

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Thu, 18 March 2021 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC2A3A1A63 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jP54Y4IAhX4J for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3113A1A5E for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml702-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F18sG6D35z680d1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:42:10 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggeme751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.97) by fraeml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 02:46:45 +0100
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by dggeme751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:46:43 +0800
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:46:43 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Adoption Call on DT document (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-autoconf-considerations-00.txt) [3/10/2021 to 3/31/2021]
Thread-Index: AdcV15/852cYjdzAQl+xVaaVIQkR1AFvR3LQ
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 01:46:43 +0000
Message-ID: <037e0a64ca1e469282fab20d21f9cd5e@huawei.com>
References: <010401d715d7$b061cb70$11256250$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <010401d715d7$b061cb70$11256250$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.143]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_037e0a64ca1e469282fab20d21f9cd5ehuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/gi23SG73Evj64jA6gIQevpLMEVQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption Call on DT document (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-autoconf-considerations-00.txt) [3/10/2021 to 3/31/2021]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 01:46:56 -0000

Hi Sue,

As a design team member I support the adoption of this document.

Please see my replies to the questions inline:

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 2:04 AM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] Adoption Call on DT document (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-autoconf-considerations-00.txt) [3/10/2021 to 3/31/2021]

Greetings:

This is an adoption/feedback call for the DT team document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-autoconf-considerations/

This call for comments will run for 3 weeks.

In your feedback please let us know:


1)      do you think this represents a good set of requirements for bgp autoconf protocol in the data center?

Yes.


2)      Do you think the document should remove any requirements or add an requirements?

None at current stage, while further discussion about which set of requirements are MUST and which set are optional may be helpful.


3)      Do you think the review of the protocols should be moved to another document?

The review of the existing proposals is another targeted output of the design team, at current stage it is convenient to have them in the same document for people to review. It may be split out as a separate document later based on WG consensus.


4)      Should a IDR DT create the requirements for non-Data Center deployments prior to starting work on a BGP auto-configuration protocol? If so, should a DT start these requirements in parallel?

This may depend on the requirement from the operators. Some discussion about non-DC scenarios already happened in the autoconf DT, thus if needed the discussion about non-DC case could continue there.

Best regards,
Jie

Cheers, Sue Hares