Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5423F1294E0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 03:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QGrXmwHFPPIm for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 03:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D370D1294D2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 03:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1996; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1478169529; x=1479379129; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=6obqSwHFdcU0wa0+QlMVmIjFnaEvSrU3sAGonmYzleo=; b=mvtYSskz5gHnJHbu3cLSkon6MYsIuzEvFLHHGimPeEyQEigZUxzqp/F3 TPSzqZlS4JjqqyT0mJ8ikY4kjFmTfAGHvw/SeWvK17SnwAozzvlkyERRe vZ/IjLtqqCY53aiC2b99TA4xgRtElljat0r8sU1fWhiI0JT9CYfwdrGN7 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AVAQDnEhtY/4gNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgzABAQEBAR9YfAeNMJZ/lEeCCB0NhXgCGoIJPxQBAgEBAQEBAQF?= =?us-ascii?q?iKIRhAQEBAwEBAQEaBhE6CwULAgEIGAICJgICAiULFRACBA4FiE4IDq1HjQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYEJhTaBfQiCUIRHgwQtgi8FmiABiT2Gf4F?= =?us-ascii?q?uhG+JLY0dhAMBHjdrg1qBRXIBhm2BDAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,438,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="342195769"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Nov 2016 10:38:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (xch-rtp-009.cisco.com [64.101.220.149]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA3AcmkK008784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 10:38:48 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) by XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (64.101.220.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:38:47 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:38:48 -0400
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext
Thread-Index: AQHSNb51aLtVLRwzQEW0V6I0YlFd2Q==
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 10:38:48 +0000
Message-ID: <8F949488-CFC4-4140-9264-834AB0B64265@cisco.com>
References: <BB8878B2-97E1-4B9A-B2CB-2AAA670AFB7C@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB8878B2-97E1-4B9A-B2CB-2AAA670AFB7C@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.90.11]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <00CDDF5295EE7C47ADD6ED584E438762@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/goI17MU5FoQuVpfUCGXD8o-EIn0>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 10:38:55 -0000

as co-author:

. I support the adoption of this document as WG item because 
  it describes a useful BGP-LS extension, already reflected in
  multiple implementations, and also it defines a substantial 
  amount of codepoints that require IANA allocation.

. I’m not aware of any IPR related to this document.

Thanks.
s.




> On Oct 31, 2016, at 10:16 PM, John G. Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> The authors have asked (some time ago actually) for the WG to adopt draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext. 
> 
> If you support or oppose adoption please reply indicating so. Reasons for your position are helpful, as volunteering to review, comment, and/or shepherd.
> 
> The adoption call will end November 13.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --John
> 
> P.S.: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-04.txt
> 
> Abstract
> 
>   Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end
>   paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of
>   topological sub-paths, called "segments".  These segments are
>   advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS, OSPF and
>   OSPFv3).
> 
>   This draft defines extensions to the BGP Link-state address-family in
>   order to carry segment information via BGP.
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr