Re: [Idr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with COMMENT)

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Thu, 20 December 2018 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7DE12E043; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:57:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56cbYy1erie4; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:57:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0742127B4C; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:57:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2444; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1545281839; x=1546491439; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=oM8EKitRJA8K8UhY+8zViD0RcZ98kspBZpCdZkbOVdQ=; b=K1agpHk9w3StW04Y6JPc3pAuWmG4GsPbNbHAFYNnE3rFCcXYo6Sytotp JMLAqSkUBxCPsl2XTJccTGIrlHX/AI/5h7KhjFXkMAjG4eKsMIJlIskPu yeGYnK7Djqb282EXe3jhu7rR45rgf81c0XMJIsixjZ1F0L4HvnemBtDp0 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAAC5IBtc/5BdJa1kGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBggNmgQInCoNziBmOCXyCSYVQjkgUgWc?= =?us-ascii?q?LAQEjhEkCF4JUIjQJDQEDAQECAQECbRwMhTwBAQEBAyMRRQwEAgEIEQQBAQM?= =?us-ascii?q?CJgICAh8RFQgIAgQBDQUIgxuBaQMVD6c2gS+EQUCDAw2CGAWBC4s0F4FAP4E?= =?us-ascii?q?Rgl01gldHAgECAYEqARIBgyeCVwKJSoF2ilqKajMJAocOhyGDKSCBXoUfily?= =?us-ascii?q?JSIR6gROKCAIRFIEnHzhlWBEIcBWDJ4schT9BMQGMKIEfgR8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,375,1539648000"; d="scan'208";a="215113355"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2018 04:57:17 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wBK4vHlt014313 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 04:57:17 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 22:57:16 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 22:57:16 -0600
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUl/SHCZj3DqbwL0+IwvEm/ZeogqWHD6Bw
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 04:57:16 +0000
Message-ID: <046df70c29294a44bffc730a8e505290@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <154526295343.2209.16645857016755690314.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154526295343.2209.16645857016755690314.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.112.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/gqqtDY7cw8tQvIrEiWIfA6Edhic>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 04:57:21 -0000

Ben -

Inline.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 3:43 PM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org; Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>om>;
> aretana.ietf@gmail.com; idr-chairs@ietf.org; shares@ndzh.com; idr@ietf.org
> Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with
> COMMENT)
> 
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi, thanks for the work on this. I just have a couple of editorial comments:
> 
> - abstract: Please expand BGP-LS on first mention here and in the
> introduction.
> While BGP is listed as a well-known abbreviation in the registry, BGP-LS is
> not.
> 
> §1: Please expand BGP-LS and NLRI on first mention.
> 

[Les:] Interestingly, even RFC 7752 does not actually expand the "BGP-LS" acronym. I would therefore like to leave the text as is on this point: " BGP-LS ([RFC7752])"

Regarding NLRI I agree - but if it is OK with you I will follow up on this during RFC Editor review.

   Les