IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15C812081A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.748
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hl5Rbzk907By for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A214612006F for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.20.155;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:25:49 -0400
Message-ID: <01a301d58f25$8c17ce70$a4476b50$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01A4_01D58F04.05093BB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdWPJPqmUURw1HlxSJ6RzWhR5/pNig==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 191029-0, 10/29/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/h1cj-wtRpnhwIwJ7T-Lu1S-mo8M>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:25:56 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt. 

 

The first thing the authors need to do during the WG LC is to indicate whether the protocol implementation report  on this draft is accurate on the IDR Wiki:

 

 https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution%20implementations

 

The IDR WG needs to know whether the 4 implementations indicated (2 cisco and 2 Huawei) have interoperated using this TLV code point.   The current web page leaves some doubt. 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email