[Idr] Re: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-36 ietf last call Secdir review

[Aijun Wang <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Akira:

Thanks for your review and suggestions!
I have updated the document and will upload it later, together with other possible reviews from other experts.

Aijun (on behalf of all co-authors).

-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Akira Tsukamoto via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2026 11:47 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-36 ietf last call Secdir review

Document: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext
Title: BGP-LS Extension for Inter-AS Topology Retrieval
Reviewer: Akira Tsukamoto
Review result: Has Nits

I am reviewing this Internet-Draft as part of the secdir Last Call assignments.

The subject is outside my area of expertise, but I have feedback on how understandable the content is.

Document: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-36
Reviewer: Akira Tsukamoto
Review Date: 2026-07-28
Intended Status: Standards Track

Nits/editorial comments:

1. Section 5

Missing space in
"...as specified in Section 5.2 of[RFC9552]."
should be
"...as specified in Section 5.2 of [RFC9552]."

2. Section 5

The
"...(refer section 5.2.2 of [RFC9552])..."
should be
"...(refer to section 5.2.2 of [RFC9552])..."

3. Section 10, Security Considerations

“As such, operators SHOULD handle this critical information in a manner that restricts it to the walled garden.” should be “As such, operators SHOULD handle this critical information in a manner that restricts it to the walled garden or filtering it before it leaves the walled garden.”

Akira



_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]