[Idr] New Segment Type Allocation Request Added Fw: I-D Action: draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11.txt

liu.yao71@zte.com.cn Tue, 21 May 2024 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D342C151996; Tue, 21 May 2024 00:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.893
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTjwObv7x97w; Tue, 21 May 2024 00:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D09FDC1D4A75; Tue, 21 May 2024 00:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4Vk6BG1fKXz6G3wf; Tue, 21 May 2024 15:53:26 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app01.zte.com.cn ([10.40.12.136]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 44L7rIWW004320; Tue, 21 May 2024 15:53:19 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from liu.yao71@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Tue, 21 May 2024 15:53:21 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 15:53:21 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc664c52f1ffffffff94c-f208f
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202405211553211266VyaE3MY_RqV5FjSxkqnu@zte.com.cn>
References: 171627522685.5892.11845720058385554655@ietfa.amsl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: liu.yao71@zte.com.cn
To: spring-chairs@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 44L7rIWW004320
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 664C52F6.000/4Vk6BG1fKXz6G3wf
Message-ID-Hash: SCKRF7CP4WMCNFPBSGHERZNQFUGXR63X
X-Message-ID-Hash: SCKRF7CP4WMCNFPBSGHERZNQFUGXR63X
X-MailFrom: liu.yao71@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] New Segment Type Allocation Request  Added  Fw: I-D Action: draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11.txt
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hBHnK8mrvk6s6WLPzEroKwMJDlc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

Dear Chairs and All,

Thanks for the discussion and suggestions on draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr in yesterday(5/20)'s IDR interim meeting.
Based on the conclusion that the allocations for new Segments Types(in SRPING) and the corresponding new Segment Type sub-TLVs(in IDR) need to be coordinated at the same time, v-11 of the draft has just been uploaded.
In this version, a new IANA sub-session is added to claim the request for alphabetical identifier allocations for the new Segment Types. And there're already descriptions in the previous version about that this document defines new segment types in the abstract session, introduction session and the beginning of session 3.

Please review the draft and check whether the update and the new Segment Type allocations are appropriate for SPRING. Any comments and suggestion are more than welcome.

Thanks,
Yao



Original


From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <i-d-announce@ietf.org>;
Cc: idr@ietf.org <idr@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年05月21日 15:09
Subject: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11.txt

Internet-Draft draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing (IDR) WG of the IETF.
 
   Title:   Advertising SID Algorithm Information in BGP
   Authors: Yao Liu
            Shaofu Peng
            Gyan Mishra
   Name:    draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11.txt
   Pages:   12
   Dates:   2024-05-21
 
Abstract:
 
   This document defines new Segment Types and proposes extensions for
   BGP to provide algorithm information for SR-MPLS Adjacency-SIDs when
   delivering SR Policy via BGP.
 
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr/
 
There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11.html
 
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11
 
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
 
 
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list -- idr@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to idr-leave@ietf.org