Re: [Idr] WG Adoption for draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

"Stephane Litkowski (slitkows)" <slitkows@cisco.com> Wed, 04 November 2020 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <slitkows@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1743F3A0C15 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:03:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=fIyrQDwl; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=OSd28w2J
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B0H9-uLXLWM7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:03:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413D23A0AE3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:03:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16100; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1604476998; x=1605686598; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=GxM6YmmAOVxJGJi7BrdmWSrf6OwNo8jAlG5pBedmKKI=; b=fIyrQDwlvSBf8dN+uOprSKbP6zParMEOUe/nd0qAM86+j/G76i4xNhec L+f0TpDdsrt0xtEJvEqaz8uNummXcX2Ms1O3Tpz/+YY57IjY9QP3t7CWh 2HK3tOW3jlmT6BxPaNWMQgrtrL7b0zOZSo/kvMMWznV5U+9Os0GcaCTY8 0=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AtWvyvxYuvd6qJKtD9Q4VLi7/LSx94ef9IxIV55?= =?us-ascii?q?w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el21QaTD4PX+fICgO3T4OjsWm0FtJCGtn1KMJlBTA?= =?us-ascii?q?QMhshemQs8SNWEBkv2IL+PDWQ6Ec1OWUUj8yS9Nk5YS8DydV2UqXq3vnYeHx?= =?us-ascii?q?zlPl9zIeL4UofZk8Ww0bW0/JveKwVFjTawe/V8NhKz+A7QrcIRx4BlL/U8?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CSBgCoX6Jf/4gNJK1iHgE8DAILFYF?= =?us-ascii?q?PgSMvIy4HcFkvLgqHfAONT5QQhG+BLoElA1QLAQEBDQEBIwoCBAEBhEoCggw?= =?us-ascii?q?CJTQJDgIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBHGFYQyFcgEBAQEDEgsQEwEBKQ8PAgEIDgM?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQEvMh0IAgQBEggagwWBfk0DLgEOpFYCgTuIaHSBNIMEAQEFgUdBgnwYghA?= =?us-ascii?q?DBoE4gnKKSBuBQT+BEAFDgk8+gQSBWQIDAYFdJAeDHYIsmn6MDJEbCoJtiQq?= =?us-ascii?q?SIYIGgRKKEpRDh1mLdIp4lUwCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVQ6KoEtcBWDJFAXAg2OVoM?= =?us-ascii?q?6hRSFRHQ4AgYKAQEDCXyLCC2BBgGBEAEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,450,1596499200"; d="scan'208,217";a="598533594"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Nov 2020 08:03:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0A483DtA014574 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:03:13 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 02:03:12 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 02:03:11 -0600
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 02:03:11 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=O5NErKe0Y06PibHxhlL0j+8ANMesQH/nNeZPAk90URHGI7NfQBJoQGfiQqlil392bcn5+XxKVlEgSZFp+/3VMb8bAxXnPe/5+HniN7fW/ap7udf6nsMyRCzEJUr+4QrvbcOn2InRESYMOnZKaIP/eakwLH9DLul6AdG8odS8I8IhvitOkH+WfMQf6mZFgNVjWyhPUtzEE8NU6hm3ydyymOswpoYwNXyzWSEkVmo9ShtjIjvgjwIXtMmQneHgYuzv/jMsWheLGnF3VkN2mXynxMudFQ0sG0u1axyoSInhuAF3wljLZVVlz3ub125k9P7U2NpHl8ml8ciWUV2zfrXjLw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qUrrN7d3C5X0/Vsw3nBdQZRtohXlWoKHAja55V0zVuw=; b=Ejqq+oj6mX1pkayCcO4Y0eB6LgJ9ImfvwppABS2/znDnMAn9mqtBTWpheYwgghtzQTmNZgwRMCKFTG6UUvDJEm8yduGFnjRXS8VChwLg4+tTm2Vj6FUppQg9vgDFHXtADqOwWP4j3e8hM4YYCgHXeT9aYt3BeTxcVgxnoNSREu4jumc0KFdVw8TuJ3gmlJs6MAAqIszxZF1zogL+l1Ku3xZB0Aj5v9MPU3PSR9AKbYmuCTYK452MopK8U5rCPr2wOt81TZnSs3+o3R6+4vnoUmiH6ZTwlJxEn6YlBWqAKRHeKxFe7LBgY/nIXyG9+UbszDl62ym4OT+bBiv8VijUpw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qUrrN7d3C5X0/Vsw3nBdQZRtohXlWoKHAja55V0zVuw=; b=OSd28w2JGQRZz+1s5sIq3lRziT4nwZ2c0ynI6Qi5niczK5OOxjuBBcJOHM8SNW+rZ6gXplPAX+r1TWhVzwHDBlhegbT7P5DQpHj3AJfzo/Oe23righvJqZikDYlXNLKhu1uZ3LjvHCaxJ/dpi+tOMAiHnYUH7slpI7GSHpRpIr0=
Received: from SJ0PR11MB5136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:2d1::18) by SJ0PR11MB5167.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:2d9::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.18; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:03:10 +0000
Received: from SJ0PR11MB5136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6429:391a:1093:1bed]) by SJ0PR11MB5136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6429:391a:1093:1bed%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.032; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:03:10 +0000
From: "Stephane Litkowski (slitkows)" <slitkows@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG Adoption for draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
Thread-Index: AQHWsoDt6Lr8VUABQe2O6Y7iaRDQVw==
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:03:10 +0000
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB5136C14AD3AED30EF5EC128BC2EF0@SJ0PR11MB5136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <050501d6b0d5$877d5970$96780c50$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <050501d6b0d5$877d5970$96780c50$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ndzh.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ndzh.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.43]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 31fb013e-5166-4e43-b2a9-08d88098125b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SJ0PR11MB5167:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SJ0PR11MB51674C57D27B96CDC24F6A83C2EF0@SJ0PR11MB5167.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 0vLCQ627Op+ZviAKNXFDYSmgU/FA+l06veVcWdLZ1RkV/90oG+ancBZD/Sm+vaGuOJTJxKxo569zM/GddgWECPeJGLHLcNWLd/mvvqSUhfypI5sSTdQIrOo7jjWoewpkq8YG9KQQS3H21yhnnONJN7ORrsJsnitzcJtQ/YHdhYzjk9GbzFAMlT+yN2AndWdwz08cJVWntR4AxgXSGZBUWgtRrc3+Up+DLikbe2QFW7nozhOUxS57RMNVleiwYnUQMk8nL2K4MSAeM6529QpF63aSVr4UABgHRipOrwehVYbzVEbk8NT3GAYHZL/DRm3f90mHLbCEP4PUEBAebkijcQBrpkhpGP1nRh6w1JAA01BXKNiTfFico8rgSe0IqyJB6JtycZBKL4LBh2BQsO1soA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SJ0PR11MB5136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(366004)(396003)(376002)(71200400001)(110136005)(86362001)(83380400001)(9686003)(8676002)(316002)(66476007)(186003)(966005)(66946007)(2906002)(33656002)(55016002)(26005)(7696005)(66556008)(8936002)(6506007)(478600001)(5660300002)(66446008)(166002)(52536014)(64756008)(76116006)(53546011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SJ0PR11MB5136C14AD3AED30EF5EC128BC2EF0SJ0PR11MB5136namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SJ0PR11MB5136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 31fb013e-5166-4e43-b2a9-08d88098125b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Nov 2020 08:03:10.2377 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Frkz5maRsYOdDGw+pMz3wker6+j2Xt4LU+y3njEFOzuy482WYf5NEVDKcvYLGfoCT+VKFT3Wx54Qy3m5ph5SNQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ0PR11MB5167
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hDxAOnKmBCXird2xkBO6lxAaWXk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption for draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 08:03:20 -0000

Hi,

"a) Are there ways to pass IGP link MTUs in
the IGPs?  If so, is this needed in BGP-LS"

This is a valid point, most of the time BGP-LS is feeded by IGP LSDBs (of course there are other ways too). While I see that IS-IS has some MTU subTLV coming from TRILL RFC7176 (possibly never been implemented), I don't see anything for OSPF (I'm not an OSPF expert, so I may have missed it).
Shouldn't this be checked and validated with LSR WG before adopting ?


Stephane


From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: lundi 2 novembre 2020 06:04
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption for draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu-04.txt (11/1 - 11/16/2020).

The authors should send in an IPR statement for this draft
by 11/5 so the WG can include the IPR status in their decision.

You can access the draft at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu/

Since this draft is reference by an existing IDR draft
I've included a bit of background below to help you place
this draft into the larger context of the SR additions to BGP-LS
and the draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-19.txt.

This draft does continue BGP-LS additions.  if you
are opposed to any BGP-LS additions rather than
this specific addition, please make that clear in your
comment in this discussion.

The authors requested a WG adoption at IETF 108.
The IDR co-chairs thank the authors for their patience.
This draft has been delayed by process of having a
new document shepherd (Sue Hares) come up to speed
on draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encapsulation.

Cheers, Sue

Background
===========
Segment Routing technology creates SR tunnels that are
directly overlaid on MPLS or SRv6.  While existing MPLS technology
(LDP and RSV-TE) provides mechanisms to negotiate path MTU
based on individual link MTU limits, the Segment Routing (SR)
on BGP-LS Link Attribute does not pass information on
MTU size per link.

draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-02.txt sends PATH MTU
information in the tunnel-encapsulation attribute for the tunnel type
SR-Policy that handles segment routing (SR) paths.
However, it lacks the information to create a reasonable
Path size since the BGP-LS Link Attribute does distribute
this information.

The draft proposes adding a new sub-TLV for MTU size
to the BGP-LS Link Attribute TLV, and
draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-02.txt mentions this
draft as one possible way to distribute the per link
MTU.

Questions for the authors might be:
a) Are there ways to pass IGP link MTUs in
the IGPs?  If so, is this needed in BGP-LS

b) What other mechanisms pass link MTU?