Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22]

"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6B8120133 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=mPRulNuE; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=cemkQHYH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id osk1U2z3tzkU for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6831412004D for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=25850; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1566300845; x=1567510445; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=79yGiI+MS1G7S+itafFIR31Gc1xk0F6jZJQ4v86oVA4=; b=mPRulNuEOxWEFqs33S/+J5hfCuLegifL1XVyVYDGtnFpA382/OwlBnyY 9iKZY/d1FH+Yb4YsMSIx7Z/1Lr1+cMprJIJQF4nhZlR9MvtRFFST48Mwb VMJLtGE4jo5YTVhozx4lpUv5PIGjfoWjb9joGSJP/w3N4rjG/dJT3eI75 s=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A7kIlVRXV8udBzyGHX6n7+btRINbV8LGuZFwc94?= =?us-ascii?q?YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSANSJ8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTF?= =?us-ascii?q?dE7KdehAk8GIiAAEz/IuTtank5EdhLUkNN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CqAABu2Vtd/4MNJK1mGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBZ4EWL1ADbVUgBAsqhB+DRwOKfIJcfpZnglIDVAkBAQEMAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?tAgEBhD8CF4I5IzgTAgUBAQQBAQECAQYEbYUnDIVKAQEBBBILBgoTAQE3AQ8?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQgRAwEBASgDAgICMBQJCAEBBAENBQgTB4MBgR1NAx0Bn3QCgTiIYXOBMoJ?= =?us-ascii?q?7AQEFhRAYghQJgTSLaRiBQD+BEUaCFzU+hEYeFoJVMoImjD2CWoUPlkYGZwk?= =?us-ascii?q?Cgh2UVIIxhzCOZY1bgTaWWAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBZyGBWHAVgyeCQgwXg0+KU3K?= =?us-ascii?q?BKY4fAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,408,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="314727710"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 Aug 2019 11:34:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7KBY4b1009331 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:34:04 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 06:34:03 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 06:34:03 -0500
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 06:34:03 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=aSSqrZjLF2UfRF5FjOqFuvDFE8wvaXhgS0qVCi/9PEIgfiOe+CREia+gkn+gVTQGt+2Nj5pkdR8Us2Q9Pu5tDh+Eo34/ixvyOekSm84hUvl0a80Es4Emqnu+LzRiBx8zOtNTmcnYC5EZDHcIhRIGoDIOEP4xwhjhx9wcNiXjInpG1XPSQT4214gwLC6fRAamnfaJpyIpPwkcSQDP8Sci5uPDVPQlvwf8RanB3ZJXQhigl8Q5JNlDYAng+nldexHsKkTuugbYFnvVL0U+GFVS5JqaXBOJ8OeE3pi3PMntRRgcELcZLXyvMWbE5DPhKahvGjf3quGD7+0vx6lW7exeYA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=79yGiI+MS1G7S+itafFIR31Gc1xk0F6jZJQ4v86oVA4=; b=LzQTgxhkrRa4QAbFh+P8E5HI21pUoceAKxJABKFgyY+Da7EOQCTwRpasNgggz+GKG6gyguDec3aO+YDV/Wsk3DDOJEm1b4rkF0Ey2K81+W/g3YQz4Oot2aF1c6EXBLcO4isYdVfKlD+04K5H772AzO3mHfMuCgMv2APJTI8Z5C4nqJgTEUuerAp5G3vY9pqUStgWSEMEZmhJSHMduJWXBHwC1E2Nsaai2E2SeXhdWlG4RJdCq0DUNfT2gRvhOJ1aFYztk/lHBMuOtx9fcM7u9rj6TZqLhz6EyL/P71L6IkyNuq5qg+Dfvs7GjufsmwbYI8K3e00oACkLkXpIQxqN3A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=79yGiI+MS1G7S+itafFIR31Gc1xk0F6jZJQ4v86oVA4=; b=cemkQHYHV83FXKVRfg80Ra1i60333obPDIXndZyHDQxt7Tb0nfntflMRdxu7PNBG26X5X5MQF+8CcztIdQMov9ZYppmlccHj3gTneFlX4oI4gj6i7tnUFkXiKO8eraHVEwW+8XtB/hSeKFGUfE9Q63pAzxhEYBEiRm+Kx54KaBY=
Received: from CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.68.150) by CY4PR11MB1607.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.68.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2178.16; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:34:01 +0000
Received: from CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::61b2:1a4c:bf3e:35cd]) by CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::61b2:1a4c:bf3e:35cd%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2178.018; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:34:01 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: Balaji Rajagopalan <balajir=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "'Susan Hares'" <shares@ndzh.com>
CC: "'idr wg'" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22]
Thread-Index: AdVOH5HoHfsN7/tjRt2OgDiNu7rv6QGD8qiAAKujpoAAGwk0kA==
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:34:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CY4PR11MB154146C3A1AC66D33912978FC1AB0@CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <000c01d54e1f$db81b080$92851180$@ndzh.com> <028001d5542f$5fe5cef0$1fb16cd0$@olddog.co.uk> <884B3A45-93AF-4CC2-86DA-3347F32268C4@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <884B3A45-93AF-4CC2-86DA-3347F32268C4@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ketant@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0e0:1002::1cb]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ca5842db-7317-4178-05c0-08d725624ca1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:CY4PR11MB1607;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR11MB1607:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR11MB1607F1006F0A82668AC038A9C1AB0@CY4PR11MB1607.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 013568035E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(4636009)(396003)(136003)(346002)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(189003)(199004)(4326008)(46003)(446003)(66946007)(66556008)(52536014)(25786009)(256004)(186003)(76176011)(14454004)(5660300002)(11346002)(99286004)(66446008)(7696005)(8676002)(229853002)(66476007)(14444005)(81156014)(64756008)(476003)(6246003)(55016002)(110136005)(6436002)(316002)(9326002)(8936002)(236005)(9686003)(33656002)(6306002)(54896002)(6506007)(53546011)(81166006)(486006)(71200400001)(71190400001)(6116002)(790700001)(76116006)(53936002)(2906002)(86362001)(102836004)(478600001)(74316002)(7736002)(574754004)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR11MB1607; H:CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: awaYIAbTXZtVzW70GrQfM8MDojsAkXX3sjKsYqqXzas3Z0E9vGcwrW9hjvh2jCKZxfX0nItiAo7sBXf+p8OoHnkJhMs5TfCzJLFZFC7AAMAzADCdIHd1fI0w639GI331PftgxKcm1K1KObkFxQzyRKTGmi3YiHBcXbh2aFXWbi5IHzkmLt6reQEszB1YCLSsZoyL8FJZn43vc0v3HR87n4gPBnfwLo+akXkppNGTCMPyfijIq6iT9+SuttpTDSelPOfB2g7S+gqMmR9hegGN0nsiyfhFRfF/JBRRTy5KzbgdeRvitJI0Y5TAVeGELTogGLbLcthQLbkaoS3BJvqghB20pSJW7Re5aJiaIV0p+Xfc/Sbx3DffjLtcrYuFJyiQcC+ezMQhIfAupfj582/iIqhuztm254joEiJHMgpuK1w=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CY4PR11MB154146C3A1AC66D33912978FC1AB0CY4PR11MB1541namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ca5842db-7317-4178-05c0-08d725624ca1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Aug 2019 11:34:01.6229 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: +jfgVz5S/qXFoLDMQk/WFoz4UhOusXGLZEhm4yjojPw+C8J/SKuPVb3RAmbLFAJxeHwVojwfYajWnSHmgmEraQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR11MB1607
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hNcwc24SJZvB6aX6HKjwnYW7WcM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:34:08 -0000

Hi Balaji,

Thanks for your review and your comments in improving this document.

The fact that apart from a few folks who have been involved in the development and deployment of BGP-LS, this problem was not evident to most people (until they actually hit those issues) warrants the inclusion of the text in the bis draft. I don’t  think the text you propose describes this problem scenario and it’s solution.

During the IETF at Montreal we spent a lot of time on this aspect and even presented the two options for handling the problem identified in this section. There was a lot of support for keeping things simple as described in the current version of the bis draft.

That said, we can poll again on the WG alias post adoption to take further inputs/suggestions from members on this aspect.

Thanks,
Ketan

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Balaji Rajagopalan
Sent: 19 August 2019 22:32
To: 'Susan Hares' <shares@ndzh.com>;
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>;
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22]

Hi Sue & Authors,

As an implementor of RFC 7752, I support adoption of this draft as a WG document.

I have a comment on section 4.7, though.

Section 4.7 mandates withdrawal of link-state objects advertised by unreachable nodes. I’d suggest making this an optional behaviour of the originator. Originator not presuming consumer’s disinterest in certain entries would permit a wider range of applications.

If there is agreement that section 4.7 can be optional:

I don’t believe that the contents of section 4.7 merit a dedicated section. The last paragraph of section 1, reproduced below, offers plenty of leeway for an originator to choose what gets advertised. If this text is thought to be inadequate, an additional line or two in section 1 would suffice, IMHO.

“
A BGP speaker may apply configurable policy to the information that
   it distributes.  Thus, it may distribute the real physical topology
   from the LSDB or the TED.  Alternatively, it may create an abstracted
   topology, where virtual, aggregated nodes are connected by virtual
   paths.  Aggregated nodes can be created, for example, out of multiple
   routers in a Point of Presence (POP).  Abstracted topology can also
   be a mix of physical and virtual nodes and physical and virtual
   links.  Furthermore, the BGP speaker can apply policy to determine
   when information is updated to the consumer so that there is a
   reduction of information flow from the network to the consumers.
   Mechanisms through which topologies can be aggregated or virtualized
   are outside the scope of this document
“

--
Balaji Rajagopalan


From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>>
Organisation: Old Dog Consulting
Reply to: "adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>" <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>>
Date: Friday, 16 August 2019 at 6:07 PM
To: 'Susan Hares' <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22]

Hi Sue,

I’m a co-author on this draft.

I agree that an update to 7752 is needed. Sort of regret that we didn’t get this right first time. On the other hand, turning the handle and getting an RFC out was the right thing to do 3.5 years ago, and revising our work is a good demonstration that it is implemented and relevant.

So yes, I support adoption and hope we can spend as long as it takes getting this polished.

Thanks,
Adrian

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 08 August 2019 20:31
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22]

This begins a 2 week adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22/2019]

In your comments please indicate “support” or “no support”.

The chair and AD feel that a revision to RFC7752 is needed
to specify additional error handling.  Please consider
if this draft is a good place to start for this revision.

Cheerily, Susan Hares