Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Mon, 07 November 2016 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB63112967B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:05:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7_6hHLqwiTY4 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C42A6129850 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:05:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id p190so195903516wmp.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:05:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XYPIDJ4a7eLnXpNZIFeCQk/gB1gTyMeiEeQOz4IOgr4=; b=CPqKtT6qBnj9UIM9Vw8LPy5qoWCXQIPm34gTrXNPWOKhLJY64SnyYvV0fH6Jkr7toa 7SojLAdCLBHBNBXQimATjE4ki1xs3Ga+xM8hJnm1CygLAaliIuM3GrdZuRoS7glrm+pn IzCDtjhmU72/1cetoQhqwnkQSHVcUJ3Xsj5wbQUEQtNQCfem5ceGSHJL1T2Hsng16Vtz mZEdcDQfuLQbo2b+wwnk9AWEQ0VCjfT7N5+K2/OmpNGqNypmFzrQFo+Jd0PNbJC+Q2zw lI2K5d1LISBBBE94NacnuYvtuVY/pP7u1Zs2YqYtnZuYbRadOYeEWHWY905lgCCiqm1d LVWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XYPIDJ4a7eLnXpNZIFeCQk/gB1gTyMeiEeQOz4IOgr4=; b=HOiAOQYTqvLkhEwRzz3EDJXR+CrazeMrZZy2x+gKvFNFGhoXhGl12FqxpvBcon1ssS R+PLN2sG3/YFKIKtKU/iaFVCe9MdJB66UfYpcwVOh0vI3a2MXME+Rp2MW89Ms4Vpyacj vRXT32rlb+mHXePG4H+njDQ5dxNWgS2pBgjsbmvrfikE7Vmn1nS6REeWCWO7Rv2Z17ML fEoQ5y8+tR7GH31U5PwgbXgy4w+VbNkpma/p7ttBjV86APmHIzjyT7g6CAdIJylywFTM LgshEGVFt+aBax1QSZoHplZ2sDoGUftGiKq7IUWvwA31zLymDhQDDbBpdeOMMwv9Mr/D ZBDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve3IUTOBFIy9PeOpmF2RB2ca8tBse9IfmIQb6I8BVzcZNwKC02mmRZ8qXn9l/u5KQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.102.100 with SMTP id fn4mr6292875wjb.199.1478538349592; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:05:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:a99f:2e7f:ead6:6fcd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r72sm14578059wmd.21.2016.11.07.09.05.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:05:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:05:47 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20161107170547.GA2473@Hanna.local>
References: <CAH1iCiq6jNtnkta0Bt952EQ9zOKSGt=_cCySsT5XuOKuHYO2nQ@mail.gmail.com> <86860386-9C2B-4BD5-B457-2A6DA5446CF3@cisco.com> <17E646EF-4633-423B-9AC4-B53D49C90632@gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk8NgT4RB9Hv_yrPRb2Gv2RVU9EjXUpdMc=mg0U7TeykQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161107121251.GT79185@Space.Net> <CA+b+ER=8U7kww=8KpOjSDh=XpK+O2LVmStLDf4KuG+FGjp3-UQ@mail.gmail.com> <B245D36A-DB4D-402E-87ED-3DBF31699B2B@cisco.com> <CA+b+ER=B5_7cnMhK8Ctbuu4BqHVbZn1ppc_vM04PRZmQFE40Zg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=B5_7cnMhK8Ctbuu4BqHVbZn1ppc_vM04PRZmQFE40Zg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hU0IymyNCg4HEzuVqb4gy9PPqP0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 17:05:55 -0000

Hi,

While some keep trying to add to or change Large Communities, others are
going ahead and are deploying Large Communities for the benefit of their
respective operational communities. This here is the real news:

    "INEX has become the first organisation in the World to enable BGP
    Large Communities in production"

    source: https://twitter.com/ComePeerWithMe/status/795670632243625986

We should focus on publishing draft-ietf-large-community instead of
deviating into topics which can be handled after we've gleaned more
experience with the technology.

Regards,

Job