IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Securing BGP sessions (Issue#41)

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Mon, 16 December 2019 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E893D1208DB for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:43:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkYBKXHDMMYH for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:43:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B9BC1208D8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:43:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id s64so4196677pgb.9 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:43:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=IZjtVQjLlV7vj57ZWo4dC0sUffMS+hn89srXimkmXE4=; b=cZclSesFZdno5vvGkiZ3fk1xbK7ZrbkPfxir/U0/YCeXF6X0rKQsKG3nnSJZrshaHX LosHxfkj6daAXppba4fTWA2PiLSuHXu1edeaeqR6Nac6a/UzyPSKkhdIFyanFDlPOM3T MWIb0qclFApc9PSRLGnorWjl6B+P6FNOtWQYTlAwkeWbYp4IoNEQ2v6UJUfeKF1gaUU/ 5u+wjMuV36o0rE2UTOdbuC+SSkWi+5ujYuHZ+k7vd+wjiPK0kBupfiR3YZxdqLO5TDus BvCY4WkNrS1wKGz7aVghzf8F1LkS7TZh+DYDlyQ36sx1GySETIFASPPTHBf/gTY5UUBO kujg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=IZjtVQjLlV7vj57ZWo4dC0sUffMS+hn89srXimkmXE4=; b=lt1sX+W3hQKewbvo/vnjRO6A3KvzjmNuAxabVo4sAycd4isszKtbg8P1rcOrz2IU5Y ZZAiPXIb50umCL4cbqyDzVzxZIFMdFqhitSsN7SiQlXf8dVLpR8CSH0tbP3dUJF0cuId JZiBfn5W7ophVZgD+kyZOjZulWx5JS1XdQIxYpO/f/4zOKQUbVPK2MaghKQ1OOAZPIu4 DghhgTiVgILdQlSfiDiE/9hK/nOqKag0V++ENkXwQchR61uBxR4Pk3S6GQ6Luuxtvhyy xxElanCDDLLkGJbNOG0FabxRd8P0Baa09w4K8gP0LJZx/CfOdumNsk2WsDgk0JVgcTeS ss9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV6lCfTlOQoEIC8j/rpx696jRaBip1i57tzxEnWClZrox8ha6xN t3YWPnaprRLyCp/YYgGusiI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw7uFlgA3HwBf5cO0KtehbtBgXGa4rf3A3pn3xWPJgB8ynRCeSgF45spY5tiKifZC+KykGd8w==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5219:: with SMTP id g25mr19663709pgb.321.1576521823436; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.33.123.64] ([66.170.99.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k88sm204128pjb.15.2019.12.16.10.43.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:43:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E2690A2B-6619-4192-840C-E91301D7C3F5@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D54ACB3D-458A-45D0-9488-61FF6F3DA4A5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:43:41 -0800
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA94FC36F@dggeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA94FC36F@dggeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/h_75JQ-dzmQwZGUtJ0cnIbNFGBw>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Securing BGP sessions (Issue#41)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 18:43:46 -0000

Hi Qin

> On Dec 15, 2019, at 4:50 PM, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> [Qin] Mahesh, I believe you are referring to KARP working group instead of I2NSF working group.
> which with a few changes could be used by the BGP model.

No, I am referring to i2nsf group. KARP concluded quite some time ago, and the document are not active anymore. For i2nsf, I am referring to this specific document and this particular section.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-07#appendix-B <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-07#appendix-B>

Thanks.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email