IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Sat, 16 May 2015 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6ED1B2B20; Sat, 16 May 2015 02:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iEDaSgKdW5bm; Sat, 16 May 2015 02:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3691A9075; Sat, 16 May 2015 02:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150516095828.7350.47849.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 02:58:28 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hfw-EYgdWXjox4_pwB5MPOUsFH4>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 09:58:30 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Carrying next-hop cost information in BGP
        Authors         : Ilya Varlashkin
                          Robert Raszuk
                          Keyur Patel
                          Manish Bhardwaj
                          Serpil Bayraktar
	Filename        : draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2015-05-16

Abstract:
   BGPLS provides a mechanism by which Link state and traffic
   engineering information can be collected from internal networks and
   shared with external network routers using BGP.  BGPLS defines a new
   Address Family to exchange this information using BGP.

   BGP Optimal Route Reflection (ORR) provides a mechanism for a
   centralized BGP Route Reflector to acheive requirements of a Hot
   Potato Routing as described in Section 11 of [RFC4456].  Optimal
   Route Reflection requires BGP ORR to overwrite the default IGP
   location placement of the route reflector; which is used for
   determining cost to the nexthop contained in the path.

   This draft augments BGPLS and defines a new extensions to exchange
   cost information to next-hops for the purpose of calculating best
   path from a peer perspective rather than local BGP speaker own
   perspective.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email