Re: [Idr] [BULK] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-02

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Wed, 13 October 2021 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C903A1596; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tix.at
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nn6RNxEBL5N7; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fbsd.host (mail.fbsd.host [IPv6:2001:858:58::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B62D43A121C; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tix.at; s=rev1; h=References:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type :Message-Id:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rWET+feHSGrt1R8b8bGrkLbpt4BeuFYguCpw8X3/zEE=; b=SjrrSep1wy15H+nK3eUmO3isBL cSbWFcs7rAm9F1HqU8J8rvmWGe2bU+nBksHh3nn4nG+UNPw3QUQfDFDKUb7NfdIjJhN2sRciKp5Vo wdC6GRz4DOfLETfJ08S1J6Ci+kRBgwx5YG2bliGebF1tjqDaxMvGoKR7HPo6U4URTes43x0jRsPb2 oiuUnOO4BLAgocGqo7yo2tPIiEeuhUTEga/YbhZCuTGip40Y6Z75X8tJ/zhr6AJtwvw1ML0m7kH2+ xIecqBKm8Lnz1FltptLe5zs1rmxKDUpvYjxq8/6i1hs2Tw0eYKX9uZMGVwimqS3MJdgjzb3RYeXy+ Cdl/3RfA==;
Received: from 178.165.177.124.wireless.dyn.drei.com ([178.165.177.124] helo=smtpclient.apple) by mail.fbsd.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1mabeb-000Mqt-Vi; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:40:21 +0200
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
Message-Id: <BBFF4CEB-94C3-4470-82BA-1520CE21FA0A@tix.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A0196385-D43F-4A47-883B-A5B849B7F8BD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:40:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsx5Y7UthPfWnB-vhZu4YLAT3reK3dpNH0jZGGqNg+fVgg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr-chairs <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, idr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry@ietf.org
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAMMESsx5Y7UthPfWnB-vhZu4YLAT3reK3dpNH0jZGGqNg+fVgg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
X-Scanned-By: ClamAV primary on mail.fbsd.host (78.142.178.22); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:40:21 +0200
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 178.165.177.124
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: c@tix.at
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.fbsd.host); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hshvoZYPJkLCRj20fuFfMssYodQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [BULK] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-02
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:40:36 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

Thank you for reviewing the document. I just uploaded a -03 that solves all the issues that you pointed out in your review.

Cheers Christoph

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 12.10.2021, at 19:23, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Christoph:
> 
> Hi!  How are you?
> 
> Thank you for this draft, and for the patience!
> 
> I just read it.  I have just a couple of comments (see inline).  Feel
> free to address them with any other that come in from the IETF LC --
> which I'm starting.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> 
> [Line numbers from idnits.]
> 
> ...
> 69	1.  Introduction
> 
> 71	   [RFC7153] reorganizes the IANA registries for the type values and
> 72	   sub-type values of the BGP Extended Communities attribute.  As a
> 73	   result the IANA maintained registry entitled "BGP Transitive Extended
> 74	   Community Types" includes a range of Type Values (0x80-0x8F) with
> 75	   Experimental Use registration procedure.  Out of this experimental
> 76	   range the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 have been assigned via [RFC8955].
> 77	   The primary use for those types and sub-type registries is non
> 78	   experimental.
> 
> [minor] s/with Experimental Use registration procedure./reserved for
> Experimental Use.
> 
> 
> [major] s/assigned via [RFC8955]./used in [RFC5575] and [RFC7674]
> (both documents rendered Obsolete by [RFC8955]).
> 
> 
> [major] Please add Informative references to rfc5575 and rfc7674.
> 
> 
> 80	   Section 2 of this document requests the registry cleanup to reflect
> 81	   the actual use of those code-points (removing "Experimental Use" from
> 82	   the sub-type registry names) and changes the registration procedure
> 83	   of the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 to first come first serve.
> 
> [minor] s/first come first serve./use the First Come First Served
> policy [RFC8126].
> 
> 
> 85	2.  IANA Considerations
> 86	2.1.  Registry: BGP Transitive Extended Community Types
> ...
> 114	   Furthermore IANA is requested to change the registration procedures
> 115	   of this registry of Type Values 0x80 thru 0x82 to First Come First
> 116	   Serve.  The resulting Registration Procedures should read as in
> 117	   Table 2.
> 
> [minor] s/First Come First Serve./First Come First Served [RFC8126].
> 
> 
> 119	       +===========+===============================================+
> 120	       | Range     | Registration Procedures                       |
> 121	       +===========+===============================================+
> 122	       | 0x00-0x3f | First Come First Served                       |
> 123	       +-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
> 124	       | 0x80-0x82 | First Come First Served (see [this document]) |
> 125	       +-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
> 126	       | 0x83-0x8f | Reserved for Experimental Use (see [RFC3692]) |
> 127	       +-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
> 128	       | 0x90-0xbf | Standards Action                              |
> 129	       +-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
> 
> 131	         Table 2: Registration Procedures: BGP Transitive Extended
> 132	                              Community Types
> 
> [minor] We need an Informative reference to rfc3692.
> 
> 
> ...
> 166	4.  Acknowledgements
> 
> 168	   The author wants to thank Alvaro Retana, who pointed out, that the
> 169	   IANA registry contains misleading entries in this context.
> 
> [nit] s/who pointed out,/who pointed out
> 
> [EoR -02]