[Idr] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-07: (with COMMENT)

[Ketan Talaulikar <[e-mail]>]

Hi Deb,

Thanks for your review. I missed posting an update after addressing John's
comments and my apologies that you did not get the improved version for
review.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-08

Thanks,
Ketan


On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 5:56 PM Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-07: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks to Vincent Roca for his secdir review.
>
> I agree with the following John Scudder's wording comments.
>   - titles of the subsections:  I did find myself scrolling up and down to
>   remember which letter went with which option. - Flags are set or clear
>   (picky, maybe but precise language helps the implementer)
>
>
>
>