IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IPR call for draft-ietf-idr-rpd-11.txt (7/23 to 8/6/2021)

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Thu, 05 August 2021 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0143A1528 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 20:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m-P9AAQpBwh4 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 20:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A52263A1527 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 20:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GgDdG20jBz6G9R5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:30:10 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm100003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.68) by fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 05:30:25 +0200
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.56) by dggpemm100003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:30:23 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) by dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:30:23 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] IPR call for draft-ietf-idr-rpd-11.txt (7/23 to 8/6/2021)
Thread-Index: Add/50R30zrszP22TpCblUwF6Wh7FwJtoWOg
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 03:30:23 +0000
Message-ID: <2ed14bbd271c4056925b20e17c777b3c@huawei.com>
References: <025001d77fe7$64d93b50$2e8bb1f0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <025001d77fe7$64d93b50$2e8bb1f0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.130]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2ed14bbd271c4056925b20e17c777b3chuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/iF3AJPhiyzNzY47-crk0ZLlTfSw>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR call for draft-ietf-idr-rpd-11.txt (7/23 to 8/6/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 03:30:39 -0000

Yes, support.

There is no doubt that markets and network customers have a need for a BGP optimizer.
Experience in recent years has shown that direct manipulation of BGP routes is prone to route hijacking and leakage. As Job expressed(https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2018-May/095341.html), IETF needs a solution. RPD provides such a solution.

This solution is used to control the routing policy of the local network and does not generate additional routes or specific routes for optimization. This avoids route hijacking and leakage caused by traditional BGP optimizers.

Thanks,
Cheng


From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2021 1:23 AM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] IPR call for draft-ietf-idr-rpd-11.txt (7/23 to 8/6/2021)

This begins a 2 week WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-rpd-11.txt.

There is one missing IPR statement from Liang Ou.
Liang should send the IPR statements in response to this WG LC.

The implementation report is at:
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-rpd%20impolementations%20

The two implementations are different implementations from Huawei.

This document describes BGP Extensions for Routing
   Policy Distribution (BGP RPD) to support this.

Please consider in your review of this draft:
1) if this draft is ready for deployment,
2) if the BGP extensions for routing policy distribution
Help deployments of BGP in the Internet.

Cheerily, Susan Hares

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email