IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Mon, 03 October 2016 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CE51293FB for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFnHJ4umoOER for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01EC1293DA for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f193so116527676wmg.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=E3G62w4hoZBvP9AmQg5mx/Vl4PlYiCvYnAvLTXsoSLM=; b=PYreqrDpqg7NZgrXlMVxYoCAmaHPEpJqCq92zXkQfIr2nZQ4wjfvv5IjUO0UrO7Qas t8mj4o9y1CBCTUqDI2Z5bsiqdxigDKUemJPZzdPrCS1N7jwb7KbBypoiecJIM/ZQ1mTg MWZEKvLYeAVMf9xm/cySBA1V0JO/xpASZ8OMptJRBWYBDe8tKN69qMir9m7yYIBbo8Bh Fja3B6MomEVF9FVN12Og4WpgRC2c4C7D6vgnpCDLMrutwLx/+gxJDFRL54XC3n0tdDxX hlxZ3w5xaTL0uX1QBTQvsA0ozS9RFZxm7Unw4exTpdooVATMwqKXH0gNAi6mNSOhozMU 5SpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=E3G62w4hoZBvP9AmQg5mx/Vl4PlYiCvYnAvLTXsoSLM=; b=Ao/GvJmP0nTg7JOR4pFCvmFiCH3Cu76e4xpviyDtfzZ6knhOKcZd2jgKB/cuyzJUv5 JrqCpZYqRVWDPlDnVRhMdw9F9rQIMxuAz7p3QxDSxvPVzeOyPqxBT24Lc6jvXVCFyr8L F7HeoeLxW+m1GT9RxwIHHvt7ejSEiYY/znCL+Sh6GIp620tQioaFZaPDSg+0Q+DEoUuB Lx+x7zFF/ehBjjqL+T56bRftBj/0KyB7tp29OJpm7zoRhBTU/RRE8FarqTplvYykppTC ihSe8tMiwl1qjjo4sKMfeKyJxFwvYzRg5dpZbyyrCIRVZtW9DRUzgXELojR7Aoom4NpK 4MXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlbJoYBQL+qm12egrdmfusbFAdHAhY+ZTwEnBesphKzDxuXYv1GrrPOihiX7IOu1A==
X-Received: by 10.28.134.136 with SMTP id i130mr11530680wmd.76.1475511372067; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([188.207.92.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm34915014wjf.47.2016.10.03.09.16.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 18:16:08 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20161003161608.GG3127@Vurt.local>
References: <147531113077.4216.12599976309263776317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161001085434.GW20697@Vurt.local> <005b01d21d58$aaf869e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161003095936.GC20697@Vurt.local> <04cf01d21d68$52c656a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161003115723.GD20697@Vurt.local> <57F27D3F.7090404@foobar.org> <74D0D4D0-0885-4E11-BDAB-85F9356B4AA1@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <74D0D4D0-0885-4E11-BDAB-85F9356B4AA1@cisco.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/iRpvcJGGjtKmrG7xCGcPKlmlCxo>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:16:15 -0000

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:12:05PM +0000, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
> One thing of substance that changed is the definition of 3 reserved
> ranges.
> 
> 0:0:0 -          0:4294967295:4294967295
> 65535:0:0 -      65535:4294967295:4294967295
> 4294967295:0:0 - 4294967295:4294967295:4294967295
> 
> 3 is messy. 1 is enough. Which one do we want?

My personal take is to keep all three of them reserved. I don't consider
it messy at all. More feedback from the working group is appreciated.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email