Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gredler-idr-ls-distribution has IPR
"JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com> Tue, 28 August 2012 15:24 UTC
Return-Path: <jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7694B21F84BF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0WGAEqDu1jua for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDE221F84A5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; l=9318; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1346167489; x=1347377089; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Zvez2nVtE48tRb+x9qIC9ahg7u+YqdqVaRxQIbeNipY=; b=jMPznNDmxYwrTPmyYW5DsDn1aA3m7rVjbM2baD+iqUaJdfPUIiQB/czK ARD2UXQF6iPAfc4u6FgrmT6l9cSixBJio4v9f95rg7t/dVh+eXiWrPYTt t/m316PPF3sVq3m88MP7jmvM4AchNr7J9F1SFStmr8+YQygrxnbVipMAK 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAOHhPFCtJXG//2dsb2JhbABFgkq4IIEHgiEBAQQBAQEPAQpRCxACAQgOMQcnCxQRAgQOBSKHawubUqBFBIsIhXlgA5VWji6BZ4Jj
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.80,327,1344211200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="116044084"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Aug 2012 15:23:40 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7SFNeFE023076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:23:40 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.4.209]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:23:39 -0500
From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gredler-idr-ls-distribution has IPR
Thread-Index: AQHNhTEZ0Z8ehgVziE+722rHz1ZUbQ==
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:23:39 +0000
Message-ID: <1D45071D-E9A3-4EB2-BE99-D25D96AB4B0C@cisco.com>
References: <000401cd7cc2$ffffb460$ffff1d20$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <000401cd7cc2$ffffb460$ffff1d20$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.60.114.232]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19140.007
x-tm-as-result: No--37.677800-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1D45071DE9A34EB2BE99D25D96AB4B0Cciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<idr@ietf.org>" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gredler-idr-ls-distribution has IPR
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:24:51 -0000
Hi Susan, Support for option a). JP. On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:55 PM, Susan Hares wrote: WG: The initial call for draft-gredler-idr-ls-distribution was positive. However, we have been informed that draft-gredler-idr-ls-distribution has IPR associated with it. Please see: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1864/ Due to the IPR, please indicate on of the following: a) You support this adoption of this draft as WG draft knowing it has IPR, b) The IPR causes you to want to reject adoption of this draft as a WG draft, c) You want to reject adoption of this draft as WG draft due to technical reasons We will do a 2 week WG Question Call (8/17 – 8/31). Please send all comments to the WG list on this topic. As always, send technical comments on this draft. These comments brighten the day of the IDR chairs. Sue & John _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org<mailto:Idr@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gredler… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… Steven Luong (sluong)
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… Manish Bhardwaj (manbhard)
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… Field, Brian
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… Keyur Patel (keyupate)
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… Rex Fernando (rex)
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] Call for Comments on the fact draft-gre… SAAD, SAMIR S