IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IPR call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-09

"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> Mon, 05 November 2018 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rajiva@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333A21277CC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 03:54:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6z9DURnqNTob for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 03:54:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5905127133 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 03:54:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5181; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1541418849; x=1542628449; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=CdkUINlZUpDIurZXIWhgptk6McEdHVVYx4+e77y4ZEU=; b=AzAzvlVnqZCHHKKV6cyRypfQlA8PPBaIqy3q9cINROtkPRNd+/Uhck2p P8eozS58t54BskpKwUaZ+8EDWuIliNG8j3ox/8JbglWUL1PqqPx87gn7K pzyMAMcFcn1d4PLLAnFT1wojtI1k3JR7d1MyG92fXKhCjymQqea38Adj5 A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAAA1LuBb/5xdJa1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDXdmfyiDdogYjBeBaIEfkF+FVIF6CwEBGAEKhEkCF4MzIjQNDQEDAQECAQECbRwMhTsCAQMBARsGCkELEAIBCAQKMQMCAgIlCxQRAQEEDgWDIQGBHWQPpxCBLoU8hDgdBYt2F4FBP4ERJwwTghc1gxsBAYRlMYImAo5ehiqKKgkCjCCEbxiBVYUAiguXHwIRFIEmHTiBVXAVOyoBgkGLG4U+b44kAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,467,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="476511871"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2018 11:54:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wA5Bs8vm030078 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:54:08 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 05:54:08 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-005.cisco.com ([173.36.7.15]) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com ([173.36.7.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 05:54:08 -0600
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
CC: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] IPR call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-09
Thread-Index: AdR08fDs1pJydQhkR+WMSu16TUD/SgADFEiu
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:54:07 +0000
Message-ID: <7DBFC4D8-11BE-4432-965B-2EDBF0044588@cisco.com>
References: <006201d474f8$55063a90$ff12afb0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <006201d474f8$55063a90$ff12afb0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7DBFC4D811BE4432965B2EDBF0044588ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/iqSdivHFPrFvdXyhN97gwjhWsZQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-09
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:54:12 -0000

Hi Sue,

I am not aware of any IPR.

Cheers,
Rajiv Asati
Distinguished Engineer, CX CTO Office


On Nov 5, 2018, at 6:12 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> wrote:

Greetings:

The original shepherd report from John Scudder indicates the IPR statements were made.  Unfortunately,  the current IESG will complain unless I have an online set of IPR statements.

Will the authors please send to the IDR WG list IPR statements on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-09.txt?

Susan Hares

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org<mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email