Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)

"Shitanshu Shah (svshah)" <svshah@cisco.com> Tue, 20 January 2015 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <svshah@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC7F1B2B05 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:33:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id szMd8bpUwu4y for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:33:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0DF51ACDA2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:33:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5759; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1421778832; x=1422988432; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=w12bXMud3PRNmdBvku/WO9r03n7sbhp9rCGNtpLjCkA=; b=IP44w9d9dzfiIlG4h7/C7cWKVHQm4diZ8WF8kT1QEFWdt8gCCegC9b+E NJHzCUYPQrVjSXYwgMIA9yhBgBlCxYcfUdo6uU8fcpT5gPT/biC1yirqE AouNx9rTNtLrNlMrwOa6cHnVsROuc2CHhNifI88/xB/tXi9NF3SBMsUxG 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMIAFOfvlStJV2Q/2dsb2JhbABbgkNDUlgEtw6NPoFphXECgShDAQEBAQF9hAwBAQEELUwQAgEIDgMDAQIoBzIUCQgBAQQBDQWILA3RGAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARePaBEHhCkFjlmDR4VQgRQ2gkaKXYM9IoIygTxvgQUkHH4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,435,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217";a="388919611"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2015 18:33:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0KIXctV022350 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:33:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.5.17]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:33:37 -0600
From: "Shitanshu Shah (svshah)" <svshah@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)
Thread-Index: AdA0Bc0QLug1SFDRSjq/JCByM24SQwAyQjSA
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:33:37 +0000
Message-ID: <D0E3DEB9.A993%svshah@cisco.com>
References: <050701d03405$cd9836d0$68c8a470$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <050701d03405$cd9836d0$68c8a470$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117
x-originating-ip: [10.154.208.201]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0E3DEB9A993svshahciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/irN9TCfZ_Sz_czSk5BxtuLzppFg>
Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:33:53 -0000

There does not exist any IPR for this draft AFAIK.

With respect to 2 implementations, we are currently in the process of validating inter-operability of 2 implementations.

Regards,
Shitanshu

From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>
Date: Monday, January 19, 2015 at 8:34 AM
To: idr wg <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@bgp.nu<mailto:jgs@bgp.nu>>
Subject: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)


This is to begin a 2 week Wg LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange.   Please comment on the usefulness of the draft in deployments and on the technical pros/cons of the draft.  In your comments please include:  “support” or “no support” indicate.  Authors should indicate if any IPR exists for this draft, and the number of implementations that exist.

If this draft does not have 2 implementations, it will go to a state of WG LC completed, awaiting 2 implementations.

The draft can be found at:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange/

Sue Hares