Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

[Jon Mitchell <[e-mail]>]

Funny, so many peerings turned up every day and rarely does anyone
mis-configure AS 10001 for AS 101, or if in the odd case it occurs, it
is easily corrected.  I think we are getting a bit silly if we are
suggesting a commmon typo will be 4.2B to 420K...  The argument for
being at the end of the range is that unless something dramatically
changes in regards to AS structure, a 10 digit number is definitely
different looking from anything likely to be assigned.

Jon

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:44:25PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 15/12/2012 01:40, Warren Kumari wrote:
> > (and I sure hope I'm not the poor sod who gets allocated 4200000 or 42000000 or 420000000? :-P )
> 
> or anything in the range between 420000 -> 429999.  This falls bang in the
> middle of the likely range that will be assigned to ARIN.  Let me hold my
> nose for a moment and use asdot format:  as420000 == 6.26784, and I can see
> this asn being assigned in the foreseeable future in the ARIN service region.
> 
> 900000-999999 seems to be well outside the range of any of the current RIRs
> (using current allocation techniques, there could be 6 more RIRs before
> there would be any interference).
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr