[Idr] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth (Ending 1 August, 2025)

["[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Jeff, Authors, and all,

I believe the following issue should be addressed before moving the document to the next stage.

In the introduction section, it is stated that the Link Bandwidth Extended Community is used to facilitate the maximum utilization of network resources. However, there is no content in the document explaining how this goal can be achieved. Do BGP speakers require any specific behaviors to handle the Link Bandwidth Extended Community?

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
China Mobile


[e-mail]
 
From: Jeffrey Haas
Date: 2025-07-25 16:51
To: idr
CC: draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth
Subject: [Idr] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth (Ending 1 August, 2025)
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:01:03AM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth/>
> 
> This begins the working group last call for the link bandwidth extended community draft.  Thanks to the authors for working their way through the substantive items that have been obstacles to interoperability over the years.
> 
> This last call ends a week after IETF 123 to give the working group time to review and also take advantage of the focus time that IETF meeting weeks bring to our work.
 
Note that there's one more week for last call support/not-support comments.
 
At the moment, the related discussion about merging the BESS documents has
mixed feedback.  Please also consider commenting on that point.
 
-- Jeff
 
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]