IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-02.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 14 March 2017 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2D61293F9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vMEwvZWBpHyi for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A71D12943B for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 02:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cnj86-0001ss-1L; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:52:34 +0000
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:52:31 +0900
Message-ID: <m260jcw5gg.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERnTJ4TJtgp=Jnn7k08j4dPibhB4gC69WWyQ4wDbxxr5zA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <148924277112.2960.17904473852401253352@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2k27tzs5k.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERmmqtUkJMtfOE9ABFHN0gNdztjOGELmirNgWRnDENrjaA@mail.gmail.com> <m2zigpxu7o.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ER=MaOqOr0A9VZ3TfgbSWgjk3eGwLKmnfr=byvOs11Ppfg@mail.gmail.com> <m2o9x4whh2.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERnTJ4TJtgp=Jnn7k08j4dPibhB4gC69WWyQ4wDbxxr5zA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/jA6iRfm93Z-WOx2NT2cgqB6IXJI>
Cc: Interminable Discussion Room <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:00:49 -0000

>> why do folk use RS?  to offload the bgp decision process.
> RS are used to establish one (or two) eBGP session and get all the
> juice. ​

that is one.  my case is one.  and there are others.

folk are at large exchanges with small routers; some can handle about
one view.  they do not have the horsepower to make best next hop choices
from large sets.  we should not disenfranchise them.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email