IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Regarding Color Extended Communities Reserved bits (draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 February 2020 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3BB120830; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:37:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id affi5WsTF9rC; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:37:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8764D120145; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:37:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id r18so26732109edl.1; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:37:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pBZlsfCtGL/iuEJJpgx5nIHZO1mTnPHULlbU6HweUVE=; b=Q6bHRWyVoipKnVM0D3Zx4md2AC+U6SYbbwjvDF4AMKcOTR0d3O/m/UKv8JC0QHZFhF XPyk1HpVjbmA0gGiQfsfdG0gSnynjQ9H/WKki9TJg2o+h2RmZFKSCdxUrl0LLj0oRczH BIgEdsexv8JVCBzjMPwTHNNzloia5vqxdU3KsBpPLcCMYmQ5p/rNtU3s8WuGHbS4aAtJ w1Y1HuI9epv52DE1xDGy+JMI4JTemy3keZMntOyxZ5KblaG81NfZ626PsnNcmTVu7XwF dI9GKye8qGA8Sx9qHA6NLcMb9n/m1r4OnzCKvXvD+7kd2pOR40bdNefATHk2AQ/H1EAp Cgpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pBZlsfCtGL/iuEJJpgx5nIHZO1mTnPHULlbU6HweUVE=; b=JzovHX0YCFF6jtpaEvC4wMxxA7m37n6cqVy/njotrsU0keTBQn5h5G94oZmMkUbp1p jUXPHx6948sfUlpBcJREuN38pMxpFo43eeYRAiueyZzGcp62ZJDMWbo+OsqanVZipaSC yYb1j+nkk8+3OPWA0IlsxA7K6Uk1YAKxe/ij4/A70+Ju8VAYuURM4/KreXBf7Qll0004 r54XXR0B7C75t3z3xF/Hg0rHbkLRgXe5X1vNJDlDdI3OwgCVbXiVcr0nakzkicFExrR7 Wd//pJ1Pp8fq9McCLGSs5opkf+4JKao+bGFjpVmPRgSo7KDcFzr+O60lcbH+1FJpvQeX hMTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX7wqui3CXIic/CVsneu1ObMBsab6goMS7QZB/3hGa+Tk3fChwY 8ri7djO3hbc0Y/IhdQmD8yR2yviUx5mZ4SO1FU4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzAAMrHV1Iu8VrH8LeWAK2vLsuuRnprjVi9PwNw86do9bJLj/HAtM6490U4uUznWBOyyH20iPlhRtEmfOGGvC4=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c915:: with SMTP id b21mr21698723edt.174.1582065434077; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:37:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:37:13 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR11MB154196E960AFF04881726628C1710@CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CY4PR11MB154196E960AFF04881726628C1710@CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:37:13 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESsz2MkH=0txi7PU-XcremAZxk3X=3=c4SoeZ+wqSwa7Ubg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/jReL4VHI-jdcxwSpY_e3a-BRbQI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Regarding Color Extended Communities Reserved bits (draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:37:18 -0000

On November 14, 2019 at 3:28:51 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote:


Ketan:

Hi!

I'm in the process of reviewing draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps, so I ran
into this message.

> The Color Extended Communities is specified in
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-14#section-4.3 and
> in it we have a RESERVED field. Now two bits in this field are specified by
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-07#section-
> 3. However, we don't have an IANA registry for this field/bits and neither is
> one requested by either of these drafts.
>
> I am wondering in which draft we should make the IANA request for this field
> and if done in the BGP SRTE draft, would it end up updating the Tunnel Encaps
> draft?
>
> Any suggestion on how to proceed with this? With so many other drafts
> leveraging tunnel encaps, my concern is that we should not end up with a
> collision.

I would prefer it if this registry was defined in
draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps.  I'll add a note in my review about it.

Thanks!!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email