[Idr] Proposed Agenda (Draft) for LSVR Interim Meeting

Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Tue, 18 September 2018 00:29 UTC

Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5032126BED for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r_MUbCA2v39R for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52AA3130DFB for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id h26-v6so164544otl.9 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UCeaGRfTpgHTZodnkoDDHdtXbIp6XyVXDIcjfO8Hf/M=; b=UmZUt74HJ83mU9Qc69Bau50Y8pUOW+ngmkCKQ9BugLRzIKVX5lyRE4wHd1K56wlQgM zfzdeKVXhBFg4zwI83LeWrvTwPFBFIv+F6u/G6PE8E3WMWWflVMCZ4/MWJ0dBQxZFCWN Y/U1OptIPmTElZmQsJu9fsvnyKR/EwBpYg8E4hLv4OiRuEIxycwanKQiswfrYpnn/wR8 IY33lgIt2qQcTtjCJq58dRdd/l3s8I5Cz8CFL5G7kIedUO7Whz9t8BmyXgxjeyfTbb+O XmaRbahWoVfLEyfqodWFGfpTP6H4JR2qMdmxmXZqrlXXIBz47YuhosBnSaY8Mx3iVE33 YBEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UCeaGRfTpgHTZodnkoDDHdtXbIp6XyVXDIcjfO8Hf/M=; b=S3ll4bPAxCvQ6sCzQeQpZzYTxptDDRHqthroT1a9AjD6J0e+uHy+S0pIhEAmeye85b ZEHrosb/T0GUIi4mPUvmTAzj7s5pfNtc9t/nNDfOgoQ+NKy6W1dRaIWRbjf8UvfD78hB hrGAyp0/MPDTHKHmO1QQmq6cVPWtMsTxm2Sl3EDm3RUI+6J9PC/8ZIkiPks9JSU5TTWo 5vQiSCoH9q2bhmM/JQuMlkDZ/mvmOQROAuYdEeUX1KKGrKouDIVZuHSXuNVohoCkiTmK nM787dlyXpsywga7+/85wPFajPn6yTkZRtgYxdla06/4XR28SSeaGhAUApaNVN6Xumrh 1QJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CS/OLtwgdeA3zNd3HrEaSGxaWMLt1JpwtROH5d5MuixhJlGYeh Bp3fOmm+hrSvVDYXnvT7xhCvqOWnb6QHW0OKME6zUA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vda8IW3Ul4IxNfhSQFMvDmNOLnfWQSXkHe6M8ehFCO72c2C21TQYSyJDBGecFe6K8BkLiD04Qyd3qW06DTIRqGU=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:f62:: with SMTP id 89-v6mr13660536ott.306.1537230568438; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:29:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJc3aaNsZ46xNo+8y5frfxXCeQNanVYMX-U19zhWy+Rj7TuQmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: lsvr@ietf.org
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, opsec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/j_jD8GDXyEENvlnnCTV4upSZNhM>
Subject: [Idr] Proposed Agenda (Draft) for LSVR Interim Meeting
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:29:31 -0000

Deal WG (and extended groups),

Below is the current draft agenda for the Oct 1st Interim meeting.  We
want to cover three key areas to help us make needed progress.  These
are: (1). Deep Dive into Link Discovery Requirements, (2). Deep
Discussion on BGP-SPF Base Draft and (3), Needs/options for test code.

We can adjust / add topics if folks feel there are additional  areas
to address for the in-person meeting.  We feel we want to address
areas where we can have deep conversations with the captive audience
and focus.

Given recent WG interactions, I have included (cc'ed) the Opsec and
idr working groups.

Please provide feedback this week.

DRAFT

1. Deep Dive into Link Discovery (60 minutes)
- Review / confirm requirements in - draft-ymbk-lsvr-discovery-req-01
(50 Minutes)
-  (w/ deep discussion and agreements on needs)
- Quick review of LSOE Draft - draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-01 (10 Minutes)

2. Base Draft BGP-SPF (45 Minutes)
- Focus on draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-02 and needs / updates for future
-03 (if needed)
- Areas of Discussion / focus
- Affirm / Discussion zone / domain (flooding, policy interaction)
- Discussion on concept of IGP/calculated -common RIB for all routers
vs. BGP-sPF RIB? (do we need to close on this?, policy can alter
normal behavior)

3. BGP-SPF Security Requirement (30 Minutes)
- Re-cap current discussion, close on areas that need to be address
(discussion and plan for closure / if needed)

3. Discussion on Driving test code for protocol validation (15 Minutes)
- What do we need to do to get test code?
- Do we do a Hackathon? In IETF, outside IETF, idea’s sharing and consensus ?

DRAFT END

regards,

LSVR Chairs
Gunter and Victor